Skip to the story
All stories

New Mexico sues US Justice Department over blocked Epstein files at Zorro Ranch

Attorney General Raúl Torrez alleges federal obstruction of state criminal investigation into alleged crimes at Epstein’s ranch

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Audrey Strauss, acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, points to a photo of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell during a news conference in New York on July 2, 2020. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)

What this story says

  • New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed a lawsuit in federal court against the US Department of Justice and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche on 5 August 2026.
  • The lawsuit alleges the DOJ ignored or denied ten separate requests for unredacted files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, obstructing a state criminal investigation.
  • Torrez claims the DOJ’s refusal to share documents violates the Administrative Procedure Act and undermines New Mexico’s ability to hold Epstein’s associates accountable.
  • No right-rated outlet reported on the lawsuit, though 19 left- and centre-rated outlets carried the story.

Who covered it

Left 26%(57)Centre 60%(136)Right 14%(30)

Percentages are shares of the 223 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 33 of the 256 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

86/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

12/100

256 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 30 of the 223 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

The state of New Mexico sued the US Department of Justice and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche in federal court in Washington, D.C. on 5 August 2026. The lawsuit alleges the DOJ blocked New Mexico’s criminal investigation into alleged sex crimes at Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch by refusing to provide unredacted files. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said his office made ten separate requests for information, all of which were ignored or denied.

The lawsuit seeks a court order to compel the DOJ to release the files, arguing that the federal government’s refusal violates the Administrative Procedure Act and interferes with New Mexico’s police powers. Torrez stated that the DOJ’s actions "actively harms victims and undermines the public interest." The state claims the files are critical to identifying victims, witnesses, and additional criminal conduct at the ranch, which Epstein owned from 1993 until his death in 2019.

Epstein died by suicide in a federal jail in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. His associate Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in 2021 and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. Zorro Ranch, located near Santa Fe, was sold by Epstein’s estate in 2023 to the family of Texas Republican Don Huffines, who renamed it San Rafael Ranch and plans to operate a Christian retreat there.

What the coverage left out

No right-rated outlet carried the story. None of the digests or reports mentioned the specific legal arguments the DOJ might use to justify withholding the files, such as claims of ongoing federal investigations or privacy concerns. The cost of the lawsuit to New Mexico taxpayers was also not addressed in any of the reports.

Coverage settled. We checked this 17 times and stopped on 11 Aug 2026, 05:46. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

New Mexico sues US Justice Department over blocked Epstein files at Zorro Ranch
KVIACentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

57 rated outlets

  • Left-rated outlets led on New Mexico’s lawsuit against the US Department of Justice and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche for blocking access to files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. All 12 reports stated the state sued to force the release of materials for its criminal investigation into Epstein’s alleged sex crimes. Eleven digests and the Associated Press report carried the claim that federal obstruction was harming victims and undermining the public interest.
  • The Associated Press report quoted New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez saying his office had made 10 requests for information and been ignored or denied. It also named Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s former associate, and noted the ranch’s sale to a Texas Republican family. The Independent and Raw Story digests identified Blanche as a Trump administration official. Zeit Online’s digest said the lawsuit aimed to prevent authorities from investigating the ranch.
  • None of the digests mentioned the Justice Department’s December release of Epstein files under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, or complaints about redactions. The Associated Press report alone carried those details, along with the ranch’s purchase from a former Democratic governor and its renaming as a Christian retreat.

Centre

136 rated outlets

  • The eleven centre-rated digests and one full report focused on the legal basis of New Mexico’s lawsuit. KVIA, the only centre-rated outlet to publish a full report, detailed the lawsuit’s demands: a declaration that the DOJ’s refusal is unlawful, an order to provide unredacted files, and recognition that the DOJ’s actions interfere with New Mexico’s police powers. Forbes’s digest led with the state’s claim that the DOJ was "withholding" files needed to investigate allegations at Zorro Ranch.
  • KOAT’s digest framed the lawsuit as directed at the "Trump administration," a detail also noted by The Independent. KOB 4’s digest described the blocked files as hurting New Mexico’s "renewed criminal investigation." KTVQ’s digest, citing Scripps News, mentioned the lawsuit was 40 pages long and sought documents related to Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Zorro Ranch.

Right

30 rated outlets

  • New Mexico sued the U.S. Department of Justice on 5 August 2026 to obtain unredacted files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. The state’s attorney general accused federal officials of obstructing its investigation into alleged sex crimes at the property. All 12 right-rated digests reported the lawsuit and named the DOJ as the defendant.
  • Nine of the digests identified Todd Blanche, the acting U.S. attorney general, as a defendant alongside the DOJ. The New York Post, Washington Times, and NewsNation led on the claim that federal officials blocked the state’s probe. None of the digests quoted state officials or victims.
  • The Epoch Times and The Center Square specified that the state sought unredacted files. NewsNation included the DOJ’s statement that federal court orders prohibit releasing victim-identifying information. None of the digests mentioned the legal basis for the state’s claim or the potential scope of the files.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover New Mexico sues US Justice Department over blocked Epstein files at…?
Of the 223 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 26% are rated left, 60% are rated centre, 14% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 256. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is New Mexico sues US Justice Department over blocked Epstein files at… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 223 rated outlets on this story, 26% are rated left, 60% are rated centre, 14% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of New Mexico sues US Justice Department over blocked Epstein files at… biased?
New Mexico sues US Justice Department over blocked Epstein files at Zorro Ranch is one event reported by 256 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting New Mexico sues US Justice Department over blocked Epstein files at…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered New Mexico sues US Justice Department over blocked Epstein files at…?
256 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why did New Mexico sue the US Justice Department?
New Mexico sued the US Justice Department because it alleges the DOJ ignored or denied ten requests for unredacted files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. The state claims the DOJ’s refusal obstructs its criminal investigation into alleged sex crimes at the ranch and violates the Administrative Procedure Act.
What does New Mexico want from the lawsuit?
New Mexico wants a federal court to declare the DOJ’s refusal to share files unlawful and to order the release of unredacted documents. The state argues these files are critical to identifying victims, witnesses, and additional criminal conduct at Zorro Ranch, which Epstein owned until his death in 2019.
Which outlets reported on the lawsuit and which did not?
Nineteen outlets rated left or centre reported on the lawsuit, including the Associated Press, The Independent, and Forbes. No right-rated outlet carried the story, making the omission a notable blindspot in the coverage.

Read it at the source

256 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

57
Show 49 more

Centre

136
Show 128 more

Right

30
Show 22 more

Not rated

33
Show 25 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

How left, centre and right covered New Mexico’s suit over Epstein files | MediaBias News