Skip to the story
All stories

NJC suspends three judges for misconduct, bars two from promotion

The National Judicial Council sanctioned judicial officers for unlawful detention, abuse of power, and procedural violations.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
NJC suspends three judges for misconduct, bars two from promotion

What this story says

  • Three judges have been suspended for one year without pay by Nigeria's National Judicial Council (NJC).
  • Two of the suspended judges, Justice Hannatu Kabir and Justice Sobere Biambo, are barred from promotion for three years.
  • Justice Hannatu Kabir was suspended for unlawfully detaining a litigant for 58 days without proper contempt proceedings.
  • Grand Kadi Mohammed Salihu was suspended for reopening a judgment delivered by the FCT Upper Area Court.

Who covered it

Left 50%(3)Centre 50%(3)Right 0%(0)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 7 of the 13 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

70/100

Hype

20/100

13 sources · methodology

Nigeria's National Judicial Council (NJC) has suspended three judges for one year without pay following findings of misconduct. The council also cautioned eight other judicial officers. Two of the suspended judges face an additional three-year ban from nomination for elevation. The decisions were made at the NJC's 112th meeting on 3 November 2026, chaired by Chief Justice of Nigeria Kudirat Kekere-Ekun.

Reasons for suspension

Justice Hannatu Kabir of the Nasarawa State High Court was suspended for unlawfully detaining a litigant for 58 days. The NJC found she ordered the litigant's arrest and detention for alleged disobedience of court orders without initiating proper contempt proceedings or serving mandatory forms. This action violated the litigant's right to fair hearing, according to the investigation committee. Grand Kadi Mohammed Salihu of the Jigawa State Sharia Court of Appeal was suspended for reopening a judgment delivered by the FCT Upper Area Court. The NJC determined he exceeded his authority by constituting a committee to review the judgment and assigning it to another judge, which amounted to an appeal against a valid judgment. Justice Sobere Biambo of the Rivers State High Court was sanctioned for ordering the arrest of litigants and imposing fines of N300,000 each in a civil dispute without due process or proper contempt proceedings.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated or centre-rated reports mentioned the NJC's recommendation of 28 candidates for various judicial appointments, a detail noted by allAfrica.tv in its full report.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 5 Nov 2026, 09:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

3 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports led with the suspension of three judges for misconduct. Punch Newspapers highlighted "unlawful detention, abuse of power" in its headline. Vanguard News used the phrase "Judicial Misconduct: NJC suspends 3 judges, places 6 on watchlist." Premium Times Nigeria's headline stated "NJC suspends three judges, warns seven others." These reports detailed the reasons for suspension, including unlawful detention, abuse of judicial powers, and disregard for due process. They also noted the additional sanctions of barring two judges from elevation for three years.

Centre

3 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports also focused on the suspension of three judges for misconduct. allAfrica's headline read "Nigeria: NJC Suspends Three Judges, Warns Seven Others." Channels Television reported "NJC Suspends Three Judges, Cautions Eight Others Over Misconduct." Daily Post Nigeria's headline was "NJC suspends three judges for one year over misconduct, bars them from promotion." These reports specified the duration of the suspension (one year without pay) and mentioned the cautioning of other judicial officers. They also detailed the specific misconduct, such as unlawful detention of litigants and reopening of judgments.

Right

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover NJC suspends three judges for misconduct, bars two from promotion?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 50% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 13. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is NJC suspends three judges for misconduct, bars two from promotion left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of NJC suspends three judges for misconduct, bars two from promotion biased?
NJC suspends three judges for misconduct, bars two from promotion is one event reported by 13 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered NJC suspends three judges for misconduct, bars two from promotion?
13 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why were the three judges suspended?
The three judges were suspended for various acts of misconduct. Justice Hannatu Kabir was suspended for unlawfully detaining a litigant for 58 days. Grand Kadi Mohammed Salihu was suspended for reopening a judgment delivered by another court. Justice Sobere Biambo was sanctioned for ordering the arrest of litigants and imposing fines without proper contempt proceedings.
How long are the judges suspended for?
The three suspended judges will serve a one-year suspension without pay. Additionally, Justice Hannatu Kabir and Justice Sobere Biambo have been barred from nomination for elevation for three years.
Were any other judicial officers sanctioned?
Yes, the National Judicial Council also cautioned or warned seven to eight other judicial officers. Some of these officers were also placed on a watch list for six months.

Read it at the source

13 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

3

Centre

3

Right

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Not rated

7

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

NJC suspends judges | MediaBias News