Skip to the story
All stories

Putin visits disputed Kuril Islands as US backs Japan's claim

Russia and Japan both assert sovereignty over the Northern Territories after the Russian president's first visit since 2010

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
US Ambassador to Japan George Glass said the United States remains unwavering in its support of its most important ally. (Photo: AFP)

What this story says

  • Vladimir Putin became the first Russian president since 2010 to visit the Kuril Islands, which Japan calls the Northern Territories.
  • Japan summoned Russia’s ambassador after the visit, while the US ambassador to Tokyo publicly backed Japan’s claim to the islands.
  • Russia’s embassy in Japan stated the islands are an integral part of Russia and not subject to foreign discussion.
  • No left-rated outlet reported on the story, according to the material provided.

Who covered it

Left 37%(72)Centre 28%(53)Right 35%(67)

Percentages are shares of the 192 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 121 of the 313 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

78/100

Craft

87/100

Hype

18/100

313 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 72 of the 192 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the Kuril Islands on 13 August 2026, the first such trip by a Russian leader since Dmitry Medvedev’s 2010 visit. The islands, known in Japan as the Northern Territories, have been disputed since the Soviet Union seized them in 1945. Japan maintains the islands are its territory under international law.

Japan’s government responded by summoning Russia’s ambassador to Tokyo. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi reiterated that the Northern Territories are an inherent part of Japan. The United States ambassador to Japan, George Glass, posted on X that the US recognises Japan’s sovereignty over the islands and opposes any action that undermines regional stability.

Russia’s embassy in Japan said the ambassador had told Japanese officials the islands are an integral part of the Russian Federation. A spokesperson added that Putin’s visit was not a matter for discussion with foreign states. The United Nations described the dispute as a bilateral issue between member states.

What the coverage left out

None of the digests or the full report mentioned the United Nations’ description of the dispute as a bilateral issue. No left-rated outlet ran the story at all, according to the material provided.

Coverage settled. We checked this 8 times and stopped on 19 Aug 2026, 13:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

72 rated outlets

  • All 12 left-rated digests reported that Vladimir Putin visited Iturup, one of the Kuril Islands claimed by Japan. They agreed the trip was his first to the disputed territory and that Japan protested the visit.
  • The digests led on Japan’s response. The Washington Post and CNBC quoted Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi calling the visit “wounds the feelings” of Japanese people and “absolutely unacceptable”. Al Jazeera and Zeit Online used the word “unacceptable” without attribution.
  • None of the digests mentioned US backing for Japan’s claim. The historical context of Soviet seizure in 1945 appeared in the Washington Post, Al Jazeera and El Pais digests. NPR noted Japan’s name for the islands, the Northern Territories.

Centre

53 rated outlets

  • Both centre-rated digests led on the US ambassador’s statement recognising Japan’s sovereignty over the islands. France24’s digest quoted the ambassador’s statement directly, while La Libre’s digest described the islands as "illegally occupied" by Russia. Neither digest mentioned Russia’s insistence that the visit was not open to foreign discussion.

Right

67 rated outlets

  • The Bangkok Post’s full report led with the US ambassador’s statement and included Japan’s summoning of Russia’s ambassador. It quoted Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s assertion that the islands are Japan’s under international law and the Russian embassy’s response that the islands are part of Russia. The report also noted the islands were seized by the Soviet Union in 1945.
  • The right-rated digests varied in emphasis. Free Malaysia Today’s digest led on Japan summoning Russia’s ambassador. Mehr News Agency’s digest described the US ambassador’s statement as a "provocative action" against Russia. Le Figaro’s digest quoted the US ambassador’s statement but did not include Russia’s response or Japan’s summoning of the ambassador.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Putin visits disputed Kuril Islands as US backs Japan's claim?
Of the 192 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 37% are rated left, 28% are rated centre, 35% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 313. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Putin visits disputed Kuril Islands as US backs Japan's claim left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 192 rated outlets on this story, 37% are rated left, 28% are rated centre, 35% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Putin visits disputed Kuril Islands as US backs Japan's claim biased?
Putin visits disputed Kuril Islands as US backs Japan's claim is one event reported by 313 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Putin visits disputed Kuril Islands as US backs Japan's claim?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Putin visits disputed Kuril Islands as US backs Japan's claim?
313 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why did Japan summon Russia’s ambassador?
Japan summoned Russia’s ambassador after President Vladimir Putin visited the Kuril Islands, which Japan claims as its Northern Territories. Japan asserts sovereignty over the islands under international law, and the visit was seen as a provocation.
What did the US ambassador say about the Kuril Islands?
The US ambassador to Tokyo, George Glass, stated that the United States recognises Japan’s sovereignty over the Kuril Islands and opposes any action that undermines regional peace and stability. The statement was posted on X on 14 August 2026.
How did Russia respond to the US statement?
Russia’s embassy in Japan said the Kuril Islands are an integral part of the Russian Federation and that President Putin’s visit was not a matter for discussion with foreign states. The statement was made after Japan summoned Russia’s ambassador.

Read it at the source

321 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

72
Show 64 more

Centre

55
Show 47 more

Right

71
Show 63 more

Not rated

123
Show 115 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Putin visits Kuril Islands as Japan protests | MediaBias News