Skip to the story
All stories

Serbia ties overseas voting hours to local time

Decision means voters in Chicago and Australia face inconvenient voting times

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Serbia ties overseas voting hours to local time

What this story says

  • Serbia's election commission has set overseas voting hours to align with Serbia's local time, rather than the local time in the countries where polling stations are located.
  • This decision means voters in places such as Chicago and Australia will face inconvenient voting hours, potentially requiring them to vote overnight.
  • The commission approved 93 polling stations abroad, with 28 located in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  • Over 100,000 citizens have applied to vote from abroad, a significant increase from previous elections.

Who covered it

Left 67%(10)Centre 26%(4)Right 7%(1)

Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 9 of the 24 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

41/100

24 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 1 of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Serbia's election commission has decided that overseas voting will adhere to the country's local time. This means that polling stations established in locations across the globe will operate between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. Central European Time, regardless of the local time in those countries. This change is expected to create difficulties for Serbian citizens living abroad who wish to participate in the upcoming parliamentary election.

The commission approved 93 polling stations for overseas voters, with a significant number, 28, designated for Bosnia and Herzegovina. This decision comes as over 100,000 citizens have applied to vote from abroad, a figure nearly three times higher than in the 2023 election. Critics argue that the commission has not adequately addressed requests for more polling stations in key diaspora hubs such as North America, Australia, and Europe.

Disagreement on polling station allocation

While My Mother Lode reports that the election commission approved 93 polling stations overseas, with nine of them in neighbouring Bosnia, other reports indicate a different number of polling stations in Bosnia. The Associated Press, as reported by multiple outlets, states that nine of the polling stations are in Bosnia, while My Mother Lode specifies 28 polling stations in Bosnia, making up nearly 30% of the overseas total.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mention the specific number of polling stations approved for Bosnia and Herzegovina, only that nine were in Bosnia. The centre-rated reports mention 28 polling stations in Bosnia. The right-rated digest does not specify the number of polling stations in Bosnia.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 67 times, most recently on 7 Oct 2026, 11:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

10 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports focused on the inconvenience and potential disenfranchisement caused by the decision to tie overseas voting hours to Serbia's local time. These reports highlighted that voters in places like Chicago and Australia would face inconvenient hours, with some having to vote overnight. They also noted that the decision ignored requests for more polling stations in North America, Australia, and Europe, with one report quoting an election commission member who stated this could effectively close the door for over 26,000 people. The political context of the upcoming election, including President Aleksandar Vucic's move to return as prime minister and the challenge from a student-led movement, was also mentioned.

Centre

4 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports highlighted the decision to tie overseas voting hours to Serbia's local time and the potential backlash from the diaspora. These reports mentioned that voters in locations such as Chicago and Australia would face inconvenient voting hours. They also noted the approval of 93 polling stations abroad, with 28 in Bosnia, and cited critics who argued that the decision ignored requests for more polling stations in North America, Australia, and Europe.

Right

1 rated outlet

  • The right-rated report emphasised that Serbia's election commission has tied overseas voting hours to local time, affecting the Serbian diaspora's ability to vote in the upcoming election. It stated that this decision means voters in places like Chicago and Australia would face inconvenient voting hours.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Serbia ties overseas voting hours to local time?
Of the 15 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 67% are rated left, 26% are rated centre, 7% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 24. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Serbia ties overseas voting hours to local time left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 15 rated outlets on this story, 67% are rated left, 26% are rated centre, 7% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Serbia ties overseas voting hours to local time biased?
Serbia ties overseas voting hours to local time is one event reported by 24 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Serbia ties overseas voting hours to local time?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Serbia ties overseas voting hours to local time?
24 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
How will Serbia's election commission change overseas voting?
Serbia's election commission has decided that overseas voting hours will be tied to Serbia's local time. This means polling stations abroad will operate from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Central European Time, regardless of the local time in the country where the station is located.
Which countries will be most affected by the new voting rules?
Voters in countries far from Serbia's time zone, such as the United States (including Chicago) and Australia, will be most affected. They may have to cast their ballots in the middle of the night due to the time difference.
How many polling stations will be available overseas?
Serbia's election commission has approved 93 polling stations abroad. A significant portion of these, 28, will be located in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which has a large ethnic Serb minority.
Why are critics concerned about these changes?
Critics argue that tying voting hours to Serbia's local time makes it difficult for the diaspora to vote and that the commission has ignored requests for more polling stations in key areas like North America, Australia, and Europe. They suggest this could disenfranchise over 26,000 voters.

Read it at the source

24 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

10
Show 2 more

Centre

4

Right

1

Not rated

9
Show 1 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Serbia Overseas Voting Hours | MediaBias News