Spy schools study US election interference claims
Barry Zulauf report on politicised intelligence becomes case study for foreign spycraft classes
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Spy schools study US election interference claims
Photograph: Independent Journal Review (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Spy schools in Italy, Canada, and Israel are using a 2021 report on politicised US intelligence as a case study, according to Barry Zulauf.
- Zulauf, a former intelligence community watchdog, authored the report which concluded that senior officials manipulated intelligence regarding Russian and Chinese election meddling based on their views of Donald Trump.
- The report noted that analysts were reluctant to present intelligence on China that might contradict the Trump administration's policies.
- Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe stated in a memo that similar actions by Russia and China were assessed and communicated differently, suggesting China's interference was downplayed.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
66/100
Craft
95/100
Hype
35/100
6 sources · methodology
Thin on the left so far
None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Tradecraft classes in Italy, Canada, Israel, and other nations are studying how senior officials manipulated intelligence about Russian and Chinese election meddling based on their stance on Donald Trump, Barry Zulauf told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Zulauf, who formerly served as an internal watchdog for the intelligence community, authored a 2021 report concluding that the intelligence community massaged intelligence about Russian and Chinese election interference. He stated that his inquiry has become standard reference material for young spies in training.
Zulauf's report indicated that analysts appeared reluctant to have their findings on China presented because they tended to disagree with the administration's policies. The report also stated that two intelligence officials raised concerns about Chinese election influence activities in October 2020, which other career analysts dismissed. CIA management pressured these officials to suppress these concerns, according to the report.
A memo dated the day after Zulauf's report, written by then-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, stated that similar actions by Russia and China were assessed and communicated differently to policymakers. This potentially created the impression that Russia sought to influence the election but China did not. Zulauf's report also noted that career analysts resisted Ratcliffe's emphasis on China and opposed public remarks warning about election interference threats from China and Iran.
Disagreement on official involvement
Barry Zulauf confirmed to the Daily Caller News Foundation that his 2021 report implicated Deputy Director of National Intelligence Beth Sanner as one of the officials involved in politicising intelligence. However, the WND report notes that most documents Zulauf used remain classified, making it unclear precisely how Sanner politicised intelligence. The WND report also mentions a senior CIA official responsible for Trump's Presidential Daily Brief for two years is directly implicated in the 2021 report and is now a CNN contributor.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated reports mention the 2004 law requiring spies to produce reporting independent of political considerations, which was cited in the WND report. Additionally, none of the right-rated reports mention the specific actions taken by the intelligence community in the US, such as new instruction on politicisation added to Analysis 101 or a seminar on objectivity for the whole IC, as detailed in the WND report.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 22 Aug 2026, 00:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Centre
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated centre has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Right
6 rated outlets
- The right-rated reports led with the assertion that spy schools around the world are using the scandal of politicised US intelligence as a case study. They highlighted Barry Zulauf's statement that tradecraft classes in Italy, Canada, and Israel study how senior officials manipulated intelligence about Russian and Chinese election meddling based on their stance on Donald Trump. The reports also focused on Zulauf's 2021 conclusion that the intelligence community massaged intelligence regarding election interference. The WND report, which was a full report and not a digest, named Deputy Director of National Intelligence Beth Sanner as implicated in Zulauf's inquiry and noted a senior CIA official responsible for Trump's Presidential Daily Brief was also implicated.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Spy schools study US election interference claims?
- Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 0% are rated centre, 100% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Spy schools study US election interference claims left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Spy schools study US election interference claims biased?
- Spy schools study US election interference claims is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Spy schools study US election interference claims?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Spy schools study US election interference claims?
- 6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is Barry Zulauf's report about?
- Barry Zulauf's 2021 report concluded that senior officials within the US intelligence community manipulated intelligence concerning Russian and Chinese election meddling. The manipulation was reportedly based on their political stance towards former President Donald Trump.
- Which countries' spy schools are studying this report?
- According to Barry Zulauf, tradecraft classes in Italy, Canada, and Israel are using his report as a case study. Other nations are also reportedly studying the matter.
- Who is implicated in the politicisation of intelligence according to the reports?
- Barry Zulauf confirmed that Deputy Director of National Intelligence Beth Sanner was implicated in his report. The WND report also identified a senior CIA official responsible for Trump's Presidential Daily Brief as directly implicated.
- How did former DNI John Ratcliffe assess China's actions?
- In a memo, former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe stated that similar actions by Russia and China were assessed and communicated differently to policymakers. This suggested that China's interference activities might have been downplayed compared to Russia's.
Read it at the source
6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Centre
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Right
6- Deep State's Election Interference Spin Is Now a Case Study in Spy Schools (opens Tennessee Star in a new tab)
Tennessee Star — is Tennessee Star biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Report: Deep State’s election interference now a case study in other nations’ spy schools * WorldNetDaily * by Emily Kopp, Daily Caller News Foundation (opens WND in a new tab)
- Textbook bias: Deep State’s election interference spin is now a case study in spy schools (opens Bizpac Review in a new tab)
Bizpac Review — is Bizpac Review biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Textbook bias: Deep State’s election interference spin is now a case study in spy schools (opens ussanews.com in a new tab)
ussanews.com — is ussanews.com biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Textbook Bias: Deep State’s 2020 Election Spin Is Now A Case Study In Spy Schools (opens The Daily Caller in a new tab)
The Daily Caller — is The Daily Caller biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Textbook Bias: Deep State’s Election Interference Spin Is Now A Case Study In Spy Schools (opens Independent Journal Review in a new tab)
Independent Journal Review — is Independent Journal Review biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
More in Politics
All Politics →Elsewhere on the site
Business & Economy•2 min readTrump says Canada trade deal moving along as tariff deadline nears
Conflict & Security•2 min readUK, Canada, Australia condemn Israel's probe closure into aid worker deaths
Business & Economy•1 min readTrump tariff deadline approaches for Canadian goods
Business & Economy•5 min readCanada and U.S. extend trade deadline as provinces split on U.S. alcohol return

