Skip to the story
All stories

Sultanpur court acquits Rahul Gandhi in 2018 defamation case

The case related to alleged remarks made by Gandhi against Amit Shah in 2018.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Rahul Gandhi and Amit Shah

What this story says

  • Rahul Gandhi was acquitted by a Sultanpur court in a 2018 criminal defamation case.
  • The case concerned alleged remarks made by Gandhi about Amit Shah during the 2018 Karnataka Assembly election campaign.
  • The court ruled that Gandhi's remarks were not defamatory in nature.
  • The complaint was filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra.

Who covered it

Left 20%(2)Centre 20%(2)Right 60%(6)

Percentages are shares of the 10 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 17 of the 27 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

60/100

Hype

20/100

27 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 2 of the 10 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

A court in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, acquitted Rahul Gandhi in a 2018 criminal defamation case. The case stemmed from alleged remarks made by Gandhi against Amit Shah in 2018. Gandhi was present in court for the verdict. The court ruled that the remarks were not defamatory.

Disagreement on the reason for acquittal

While the court ruled Gandhi's remarks were not defamatory, the specific reasoning behind the acquittal varied in reports. The Siasat Daily stated the court ruled the remarks were not defamatory in nature. Latestly and aninews.in reported the case stemmed from alleged "objectionable remarks" against Amit Shah. Times of India and ABP News stated the case originated from remarks Gandhi made about Amit Shah during a rally. uttamhindu.com reported the court pronounced the verdict due to a lack of evidence. TV9 Kannada stated the court ruled there was no proper basis in the case.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated reports mentioned that the complaint was filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra. None of the centre-rated reports mentioned that the complaint was filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra or that the court ruled the remarks were not defamatory in nature.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 26 Oct 2026, 07:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Rahul Gandhi
The Economic TimesCentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

2 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports from The Siasat Daily and Indian Express focused on the acquittal itself. The Siasat Daily provided details about the case, noting it related to remarks made by Gandhi against then BJP president Amit Shah and that the complaint was filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra. It also stated the court ruled Gandhi's remarks were not defamatory. Indian Express reported the Sultanpur court acquitted Gandhi in the defamation case relating to his 2018 remarks against Amit Shah.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports from The Economic Times and Hindustan Times highlighted the relief for Rahul Gandhi. The Economic Times' full report was not available for detailed analysis beyond its headline. Hindustan Times reported that Congress MP Rahul Gandhi was reportedly acquitted in the 2018 defamation case over remarks against Amit Shah, according to the Congress party.

Right

6 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports from Latestly, aninews.in, Times of India, ABP News, India Today, and India TV News consistently reported on the dismissal of the defamation case and the relief for Rahul Gandhi. Latestly and aninews.in stated the case stemmed from remarks made by Gandhi in 2018 in Bengaluru, Karnataka, alleging "objectionable remarks" against Amit Shah. Times of India and India TV News noted the case originated from remarks Gandhi made about Amit Shah during a rally in 2018, with Times of India adding that BJP politician Vijay Mishra filed the complaint. ABP News reported the case dated back to 2018 and Gandhi appeared before the court for the verdict. India Today mentioned the case was filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra and involved legal challenges over a voice sample.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Sultanpur court acquits Rahul Gandhi in 2018 defamation case?
Of the 10 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 20% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 60% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 27. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Sultanpur court acquits Rahul Gandhi in 2018 defamation case left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 10 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Sultanpur court acquits Rahul Gandhi in 2018 defamation case biased?
Sultanpur court acquits Rahul Gandhi in 2018 defamation case is one event reported by 27 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Sultanpur court acquits Rahul Gandhi in 2018 defamation case?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Sultanpur court acquits Rahul Gandhi in 2018 defamation case?
27 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What was Rahul Gandhi acquitted of?
Rahul Gandhi was acquitted by a court in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, in a 2018 criminal defamation case. The case was related to alleged remarks he made about Amit Shah.
Who filed the defamation complaint against Rahul Gandhi?
The defamation complaint against Rahul Gandhi was filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra. The case concerned remarks Gandhi allegedly made about Amit Shah in 2018.
What was the court's ruling in the defamation case?
The court ruled that Rahul Gandhi's remarks, which were the subject of the defamation case, were not defamatory in nature. This led to his acquittal.

Read it at the source

27 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

2

Centre

2

Right

6

Not rated

17
Show 9 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Rahul Gandhi acquitted | MediaBias News