Tohono O'odham Nation alleges border wall contractors trespassed on tribal land
The tribe accuses federal agents and contractors of damaging sacred sites during border wall construction.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
The U.S. Border Patrol keeps watch along the US-Mexico border Thursday, April 3, 2025, in Douglas, Ariz. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin,File)
Photograph: Associated Press News (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The Trump administration has started building a border wall on land belonging to the Tohono O'odham Nation in southern Arizona.
- The Tohono O'odham Nation accuses U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers and contractors of trespassing on tribal land and damaging sacred sites.
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection states the area is a dangerous smuggling route and the wall will close a security gap.
- A federal judge permitted the government to proceed with construction on a 60-foot buffer zone of federally owned land.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 25 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
60/100
Craft
65/100
Hype
45/100
25 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 25 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Construction has begun on a section of border wall in southern Arizona that crosses land belonging to the Tohono O'odham Nation. The tribe has accused U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers and contractors of trespassing on its territory and damaging sacred sites. The Tohono O'odham Nation has 37,000 members, with thousands living in Mexico.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection stated that the construction area is a dangerous smuggling route and that the wall is necessary to close a security gap. A federal judge allowed the government to proceed with construction on a 60-foot buffer zone of federally owned land.
Disagreement on construction access
The Tohono O'odham Nation stated that approximately 20 Customs and Border Protection officers, accompanied by contractors, entered tribal land early on 27 August 2026, to begin construction. Drone footage published by the nation showed about 14 vehicles and an industrial drill. The tribe said contractors were violating tribal codes and trespassing to access the border wall site, and that CBP agents were masked, armed, and set up a blockade to prevent tribal police from removing the contractors. The nation had previously placed "No Trespassing" signs. U.S. Customs and Border Protection stated the project would close a dangerous smuggling and trafficking corridor.
What the coverage left out
None of the 25 reports printed below mention the $46 billion figure for the Trump administration's overall border wall effort, which was included in the full reports from Washington Top News and Associated Press News.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 28 Aug 2026, 04:00, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
9 rated outlets
- Nine left-rated reports led on the Tohono O'odham Nation's accusations of trespassing and damage to sacred sites. The Associated Press, The Independent, The Toronto Star, The Seattle Times, Goshen News, Bangor Daily News, genocidewatch, and Al Jazeera all highlighted that armed federal agents accompanied contractors who allegedly trespassed on tribal land. Genocidewatch and Al Jazeera's digests noted the tribe had sued the US government to stop construction. Bangor Daily News and The Associated Press digests also included the CBP's statement about the area being a dangerous smuggling route.
Centre
16 rated outlets
- Sixteen centre-rated reports focused on the start of construction and the tribe's objections. Washington Top News, Ottumwa Courier, KTBS, Newsday, KTEN, Rutland Herald, Daily News-Record, WPLG, WKMG, Tucson, KGBT, KXRM, AZ Family - Phoenix, and KGUN 9 all reported that the Trump administration had begun building a border wall project in Arizona over the tribe's objections. Many of these reports, including Washington Top News and Tucson, detailed the tribe's allegations of trespassing and damage to sacred sites, and the CBP's justification for the construction due to smuggling concerns. Tucson's report specifically noted that masked CBP agents and border-wall contractors entered the Tohono O'odham Nation.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Tohono O'odham Nation alleges border wall contractors trespassed on…?
- Of the 25 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 36% are rated left, 64% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Tohono O'odham Nation alleges border wall contractors trespassed on… left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 25 rated outlets on this story, 36% are rated left, 64% are rated centre, 0% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Tohono O'odham Nation alleges border wall contractors trespassed on… biased?
- Tohono O'odham Nation alleges border wall contractors trespassed on tribal land is one event reported by 25 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Tohono O'odham Nation alleges border wall contractors trespassed on…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Tohono O'odham Nation alleges border wall contractors trespassed on…?
- 25 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is the Tohono O'odham Nation alleging?
- The Tohono O'odham Nation alleges that U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers and contractors trespassed on tribal land to begin border wall construction. They also claim that sacred sites have been damaged.
- What is the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's justification for the construction?
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection states that the area where construction is taking place is a dangerous smuggling route. They argue that building the wall is necessary to close a longstanding security gap.
- What was the outcome of the tribe's lawsuit to block construction?
- A federal judge permitted the government to proceed with construction on a 60-foot buffer zone of federally owned land. The tribe had sued to block the construction, arguing it would cause significant devastation and alter their nation's boundaries.
Read it at the source
25 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
9- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe’s objections (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe’s objections (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens Goshen News in a new tab)
Goshen News — is Goshen News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens Bangor Daily News in a new tab)
Bangor Daily News — is Bangor Daily News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Tribe alleges US agents 'trespassed' on indigenous land (opens genocidewatch in a new tab)
genocidewatch — is genocidewatch biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
16- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe’s objections – WTOP News (opens Washington Top News in a new tab)
Washington Top News — is Washington Top News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens KTBS in a new tab)
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens Ottumwa Courier in a new tab)
Ottumwa Courier — is Ottumwa Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens Newsday in a new tab)
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens Daily News-Record in a new tab)
Daily News-Record — is Daily News-Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens Rutland Herald in a new tab)
Rutland Herald — is Rutland Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens KTEN in a new tab)
Show 8 more
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens WKMG in a new tab)
- Trump administration starts building border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections (opens WPLG in a new tab)
- Masked CBP agents, border-wall contractors enter Tohono O'odham Nation (opens Tucson in a new tab)
- Masked CBP agents enter tribal land as contractors prep for border wall (opens KGBT in a new tab)
- Masked CBP agents enter tribal land as contractors prep for border wall (opens KXRM in a new tab)
- Border wall contractors, CBP agents enter Tohono O’odham Nation illegally, leaders say (opens AZ Family - Phoenix in a new tab)
AZ Family - Phoenix — is AZ Family - Phoenix biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Armed federal agents, contractors enter Tohono O’odham Nation land for border wall-related drilling (opens KGUN 9 in a new tab)
- Tohono O’odham Nation says federal agents trespassed. What rights does it have to stop them? (opens Straight Arrow News in a new tab)
Straight Arrow News — is Straight Arrow News biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
