Trump PAC Reserves $25.8 Million for Midterm Ads
New group linked to MAGA Inc. targets seven key races with significant ad spending.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

JD Vance matizó la propuesta económica de Trump durante un acto republicano en Dallas.
Photograph: La Opinion (embedded from source)
What this story says
- No Going Back PAC Inc. reserved $25.8 million for advertising in seven US midterm races.
- The PAC is linked to MAGA Inc., a major Super PAC associated with Donald Trump.
- AdImpact data shows $9.6 million allocated to New Hampshire and $7.7 million to Alaska.
- The group was formed on September 1, allowing it to delay donor disclosure until October.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 11 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 4 of the 15 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
74/100
Craft
85/100
Hype
35/100
15 sources · methodology
Thin on the left so far
Only 2 of the 11 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
A new Super PAC named No Going Back PAC Inc. has reserved $25.8 million for advertising in seven US midterm election races. The New York Times reported that the PAC is linked to MAGA Inc., which has a $400 million war chest. AdImpact data indicates that $9.6 million has been allocated to New Hampshire and $7.7 million to Alaska.
No Going Back PAC Inc. was established on September 1, 2026, a week before it began reserving advertising funds. This timing allows the group to delay the disclosure of its financiers until October. The spending is concentrated on Senate races in New Hampshire and Alaska, with additional resources reserved for contests in Michigan, Ohio, North Carolina, and Georgia, as well as a House of Representatives election in Pennsylvania.
Disagreement on Total Reserved Amount
Reports differ on the total amount reserved by the PAC. La Opinion, citing The New York Times, states the figure is $25.8 million. However, other reports, including those from Breitbart, [your]NEWS, WLTReport, and News Addicts, cite figures closer to $47 million or $49 million. Election Law Blog also reported $49 million, while TrendingPolitics reported $25 million.
What the coverage left out
None of the centre-rated reports mentioned the story. The right-rated digests did not mention the PAC's formation date of September 1 or the fact that this timing allows for delayed donor disclosure until October, details that were present in the left-rated La Opinion report.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 11 Sept 2026, 02:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
2 rated outlets
- The left-rated reports focused on the significant financial commitment to the midterm elections and the PAC's connection to Donald Trump's political apparatus. La Opinion highlighted that the PAC's formation on September 1 allows it to delay donor disclosure until October, keeping its financiers hidden. Election Law Blog noted that President Trump is beginning to tap into his $400 million war chest for the midterms, with the new PAC reserving at least $49 million.
Centre
1 rated outlet
We have not written our reading of the centre coverage of this story. The centre-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.
Right
8 rated outlets
- Right-rated reports led with the substantial sums being spent by a Trump-linked PAC in key midterm races. Breitbart framed the spending as an "X Factor" and potentially Republicans' "Midterm Trump Card." [your]NEWS and WLTReport reported that the Trump Political Network launched a $47 million ad push across key races. News Addicts stated Trump "shakes up midterms with huge $25 million boost." TrendingPolitics reported "Trump Stuns Dems With $25M Midterm Surprise."
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Trump PAC Reserves $25.8 Million for Midterm Ads?
- Of the 11 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 18% are rated left, 9% are rated centre, 73% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 15. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Trump PAC Reserves $25.8 Million for Midterm Ads left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 11 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Trump PAC Reserves $25.8 Million for Midterm Ads biased?
- Trump PAC Reserves $25.8 Million for Midterm Ads is one event reported by 15 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Trump PAC Reserves $25.8 Million for Midterm Ads?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Trump PAC Reserves $25.8 Million for Midterm Ads?
- 15 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- How much money has the No Going Back PAC reserved for ads?
- The No Going Back PAC Inc. has reserved $25.8 million for advertising in seven midterm election races, according to La Opinion. However, some other reports cite figures closer to $47 million or $49 million.
- Which races will receive the most funding?
- AdImpact data indicates that $9.6 million is allocated to New Hampshire and $7.7 million to Alaska. These are two of the seven key races the PAC is targeting with its advertising.
- When will the PAC's donors be revealed?
- The PAC was established on September 1, 2026, and this timing allows it to delay the public disclosure of its financiers until October, according to La Opinion.
Read it at the source
15 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
2- “Trump’s PAC Unloads War Chest, With $49 Million Headed to Key Midterm Races” (opens electionlawblog.org in a new tab)
electionlawblog.org — is electionlawblog.org biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump Moves $25.8 Million to Shield the Republican Party, with Hidden Donors (opens La Opinion in a new tab)
La Opinion — is La Opinion biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
Centre
1Right
8- Trump-Linked Super PAC Books Nearly $50 Million in Midterm Ads Across Seven Battlegrounds – 100PercentFedUp.com – by Jack (opens 100% FED UP! in a new tab)
100% FED UP! — is 100% FED UP! biased? Our profile of this outlet
- The X Factor: Unprecedented Spending Could Be Republicans' Midterm Trump Card (opens Breitbart in a new tab)
- Trump Political Network Launches $47 Million Ad Push Across Key Midterm Races (opens [your]NEWS in a new tab)
[your]NEWS — is [your]NEWS biased? Our profile of this outlet
- "That's My Money": Trump Sits on Huge War Chest - but It Doesn't Open (opens n-tv in a new tab)
- Trump Shakes Up Midterms with Huge $25 Million Boost (opens News Addicts in a new tab)
News Addicts — is News Addicts biased? Our profile of this outlet
- NEW: Trump Stuns Dems With $25M Midterm Surprise (opens TrendingPolitics in a new tab)
TrendingPolitics — is TrendingPolitics biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump-Linked Super PAC Books Nearly $50 Million in Midterm Ads Across Seven Battlegrounds (opens WLTReport in a new tab)
- New Republican Super PAC Emerges… Injecting 34.5 Billion Won Daily Into Midterm Battlegrounds (opens 연합뉴스-Yonhap News Agency in a new tab)
연합뉴스-Yonhap News Agency — is 연합뉴스-Yonhap News Agency biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
4- Let the dollars flow! MAGA, Inc opens the spigot. (opens WBT Charlotte's News Talk in a new tab)
WBT Charlotte's News Talk — is WBT Charlotte's News Talk biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- NYT: 'Trump Camp Pours Advertising Money Into Midterm Battlegrounds' (opens Unknown in a new tab)
Unknown
- Trump group pledges to spend $7.7 million on Alaska campaigns (opens Reporting From Alaska in a new tab)
Reporting From Alaska — is Reporting From Alaska biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New Republican Super PAC Emerges… Injecting 34.5 Billion Won Daily Into Battlegrounds (opens asiae.co.kr in a new tab)
asiae.co.kr — is asiae.co.kr biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


