Trump pressured officials to 'find' votes, loyalist Republicans sought to deny Biden presidency
Reports detail efforts to overturn 2020 election results and potential future actions.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
Photograph: Adam Schultz via Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)
What this story says
- President Donald Trump attempted to retain power after the 2020 election by pressuring state election officials to "find" votes.
- Loyalist Republicans in Congress tried to prevent Joe Biden from taking office during the certification of the Electoral College votes.
- There is concern among some Republican lawmakers about losing control of the House in the upcoming midterm elections.
- Reports suggest that state officials could again face pressure from the White House or powerful Republicans in future elections.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 50 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 4 of the 54 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
33/100
Craft
69/100
Hype
55/100
54 sources · methodology
Missing from the right
Only 2 of the 50 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
Following his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump sought to remain in power. His efforts included pressuring state election officials to locate additional votes. Concurrently, Republican members of Congress who remained loyal to Trump attempted to block Joe Biden's ascension to the presidency when lawmakers convened to certify the Electoral College results.
These actions have brought to light perceived loopholes and deficiencies in the electoral process. Concerns are now mounting among some Republican lawmakers regarding the potential loss of their majority in the House of Representatives following the November midterm elections. This situation raises the possibility that state officials might once again be subjected to calls from the White House or influential figures in Congress.
Coverage
What the coverage left out
No centre- or right-rated outlet reported on this story. The digests from the left-rated outlets did not include specific details about the number of votes Trump asked officials to find, nor did they name any specific state election officials or members of Congress involved in the pressure campaigns.
Coverage settled. We checked this 16 times and stopped on 17 Sept 2026, 08:00. The figures above are what it finished at.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
35 rated outlets
- Nine of the twelve left‑rated digests that addressed the Trump story led on his attempt to stay in power after the 2020 election by pressuring state election officials to “find” votes. Five of those digests also noted that loyalist Republicans in Congress tried to deny President‑elect Joe Biden the Oval Office.
- The Louisiana Illuminator digest focused on growing concern among GOP lawmakers about losing control of the House after the November 2026 midterms and suggested state officials might again receive calls from the White House or influential Republicans. It did not mention the 2020 election loss or any congressional effort to block Biden’s inauguration.
- Three left‑rated digests, the Associated Press News, abc News and the Toronto Star, ran a separate piece on prediction‑market trading. They reported that activity is soaring as states move to ban the platforms as unlicensed casinos, and that officials worry about the impact on American democracy. No reference was made to Trump or the congressional actions.
Centre
13 rated outlets
- The centre-rated digests led on the rise of prediction markets and their potential impact on elections. They reported that trading on these platforms is increasing significantly.
- These reports noted that states are attempting to ban prediction markets, viewing them as unlicensed casinos. Concerns were raised about how high-stakes odds might unpredictably influence American democracy.
- One digest mentioned that election officials are worried about pervasive financial incentives. Another cited Jared DeMarinis of the Maryland State Board of Elections, calling the trend troubling for election administrators.
Right
2 rated outlets
- The Washington Times digest led on the surge in election‑season trading on prediction markets, noting that activity is climbing sharply ahead of the 2026 races. It added that several states are moving to ban the platforms as unlicensed gambling and that officials are uneasy about possible effects on American democracy.
- The Regional Media News digest repeated the same points, citing an Associated Press location note and describing the same rise and state efforts. Neither digest mentioned the alleged pressure on election officials, the Republican loyalist strategy, or any cost figures, leaving those aspects absent from the right‑rated coverage.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Trump pressured officials to 'find' votes, loyalist Republicans sought…?
- Of the 50 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 71% are rated left, 23% are rated centre, 6% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 54. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Trump pressured officials to 'find' votes, loyalist Republicans sought… left or right?
- The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 71% of the 50 rated outlets on it are rated left — so far this is a story carried mostly by the left. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
- Is the coverage of Trump pressured officials to 'find' votes, loyalist Republicans sought… biased?
- Trump pressured officials to 'find' votes, loyalist Republicans sought to deny Biden presidency is one event reported by 54 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Trump pressured officials to 'find' votes, loyalist Republicans sought…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Trump pressured officials to 'find' votes, loyalist Republicans sought…?
- 54 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What did Donald Trump do after the 2020 election?
- President Donald Trump attempted to maintain power after losing the 2020 election by pressuring state election officials to "find" votes. Loyalist Republicans in Congress also tried to deny Joe Biden the presidency during the Electoral College certification process.
- What are Republican lawmakers concerned about?
- Some Republican lawmakers are concerned about the party potentially losing control of the House of Representatives in the upcoming November midterm elections. This concern arises in the context of past efforts to overturn election results.
- Could state officials face pressure again?
- Reports suggest that state election officials could face renewed pressure from the White House or powerful Republicans in Congress in the future, particularly if concerns about election outcomes persist or if control of legislative bodies is threatened.
Read it at the source
54 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
35- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Arizona Daily Sun in a new tab)
Arizona Daily Sun — is Arizona Daily Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Missouri Independent in a new tab)
Missouri Independent — is Missouri Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Daily Montanan in a new tab)
Daily Montanan — is Daily Montanan biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens alabamareflector.com in a new tab)
alabamareflector.com — is alabamareflector.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Tennessee Lookout in a new tab)
Tennessee Lookout — is Tennessee Lookout biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens arkansasadvocate.com in a new tab)
arkansasadvocate.com — is arkansasadvocate.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens New Jersey Monitor in a new tab)
New Jersey Monitor — is New Jersey Monitor biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens rhodeislandcurrent.com in a new tab)
rhodeislandcurrent.com — is rhodeislandcurrent.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 27 more
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Pennsylvania Capital-Star in a new tab)
Pennsylvania Capital-Star — is Pennsylvania Capital-Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Iowa Capital Dispatch in a new tab)
Iowa Capital Dispatch — is Iowa Capital Dispatch biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens mainemorningstar.com in a new tab)
mainemorningstar.com — is mainemorningstar.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Wisconsin Examiner in a new tab)
Wisconsin Examiner — is Wisconsin Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Oregon Capital Chronicle in a new tab)
Oregon Capital Chronicle — is Oregon Capital Chronicle biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens South Dakota Searchlight in a new tab)
South Dakota Searchlight — is South Dakota Searchlight biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Utah News Dispatch in a new tab)
Utah News Dispatch — is Utah News Dispatch biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Colorado Newsline in a new tab)
Colorado Newsline — is Colorado Newsline biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens New Hampshire Bulletin in a new tab)
New Hampshire Bulletin — is New Hampshire Bulletin biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Nebraska Examiner in a new tab)
Nebraska Examiner — is Nebraska Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Virginia Mercury in a new tab)
Virginia Mercury — is Virginia Mercury biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results • West Virginia Watch (opens westvirginiawatch.com in a new tab)
westvirginiawatch.com — is westvirginiawatch.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens washingtonstatestandard.com in a new tab)
washingtonstatestandard.com — is washingtonstatestandard.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Louisiana Illuminator in a new tab)
Louisiana Illuminator — is Louisiana Illuminator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Ohio Capital Journal in a new tab)
Ohio Capital Journal — is Ohio Capital Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Kansas Reflector in a new tab)
Kansas Reflector — is Kansas Reflector biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Georgia Recorder in a new tab)
Georgia Recorder — is Georgia Recorder biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Michigan Advance in a new tab)
Michigan Advance — is Michigan Advance biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Source New Mexico in a new tab)
Source New Mexico — is Source New Mexico biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how skyrocketing trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens PBS NewsHour in a new tab)
PBS NewsHour — is PBS NewsHour biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026’s elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026’s elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens The Avery Journal-Times in a new tab)
The Avery Journal-Times — is The Avery Journal-Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens Bangor Daily News in a new tab)
Bangor Daily News — is Bangor Daily News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens ABC News in a new tab)
Centre
13- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Post Register in a new tab)
Post Register — is Post Register biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Montrose Daily Press in a new tab)
Montrose Daily Press — is Montrose Daily Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Nisqually Valley News in a new tab)
Nisqually Valley News — is Nisqually Valley News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026’s elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Midterm elections shaping up as big business for gamblers in the rough and rowdy world of prediction markets (opens Fortune in a new tab)
- 2026’s elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens My Mother Lode in a new tab)
My Mother Lode — is My Mother Lode biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026’s elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results – WTOP News (opens Washington Top News in a new tab)
Washington Top News — is Washington Top News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction marke (opens WBAL in a new tab)
Show 5 more
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens WSLS in a new tab)
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens KOB 4 in a new tab)
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens WKMG in a new tab)
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens WPLG in a new tab)
Right
2- 2026’s elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results - Regional Media News (opens regionalmedianews.com in a new tab)
regionalmedianews.com — is regionalmedianews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens Washington Times in a new tab)
Washington Times — is Washington Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
4- How the US House could overturn the midterm election results (opens Dailyfly in a new tab)
- Election Results, Gov. Shapiro’s Speeches & State Laws Are Prediction Market Bets. Could It Lead To Corruption? (opens newtownpanow.com in a new tab)
newtownpanow.com — is newtownpanow.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026’s elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens Loonie Politics in a new tab)
Loonie Politics — is Loonie Politics biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2026's elections could test how heavy trading on prediction markets affects races and results (opens KXL in a new tab)
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

