Two Ex-FBI Officials Face New Charges in Hunter Biden Probe
Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides accused of obstruction and lying to Congress.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
Photograph: Prime Minister's Office via Wikimedia Commons (GODL-India)
What this story says
- Two former FBI officials, Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides, are facing new charges from the Department of Justice.
- The charges include obstruction of justice, in addition to earlier accusations of lying to Congress.
- The new charges were filed just before a scheduled court hearing, prompting defense lawyers to call the action "outrageous government conduct."
- The case involves investigations into Hunter Biden and his laptop, and testimony provided to Congress in 2023.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 10 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 11 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
48/100
Craft
57/100
Hype
41/100
11 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
Only 1 of the 10 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Former FBI officials Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides are facing additional charges from the Department of Justice. The DOJ has added counts of obstruction of justice to the existing charges that they allegedly lied to Congress. These new charges were filed shortly before a court hearing in the case.
Disagreement on timing of new charges
BizToc and CBS News report that the new charges were filed just hours before a court hearing. Raw Story states that prosecutors filed a revised FBI affidavit at 12:22 a.m. Tuesday, ahead of a hearing. The other reports do not specify the exact timing of the new charges relative to the hearing.
What the coverage left out
None of the left, centre, or right-rated digests mention the specific names of the defense lawyers who called the new charges "outrageous government conduct."
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 27 Oct 2026, 16:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
5 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports led with the new charges against the former FBI officials. CNBC, Raw Story, Associated Press News, abc News, and lawcommentary.com all highlighted the additional charges, with CNBC and Raw Story specifically mentioning the defense's criticism of the DOJ's actions. Raw Story also noted that the U.S. Attorney's office walked back claims hours before the court showdown. Lawcommentary.com stated that prosecutors allege Floris and Benavides denied involvement in matters that FBI emails, internal records, and witness accounts show they were involved in.
Centre
4 rated outlets
- Centre-rated reports focused on the new charges and the upcoming court appearance. CBS News, Internewscast, Newsweek, and KSAT 12 all reported on the DOJ filing new charges, including obstruction of justice. CBS News and Internewscast noted that the charges were filed just hours before a preliminary hearing. Newsweek and KSAT 12 stated that the officials were due back in court.
Right
1 rated outlet
- The right-rated report from The Western Journal led with the DOJ adding obstruction counts to the charges against the two former FBI agents. It stated that the agents are accused of lying about their knowledge of Hunter Biden's laptop computer.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Two Ex-FBI Officials Face New Charges in Hunter Biden Probe?
- Of the 10 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 50% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 10% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 11. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Two Ex-FBI Officials Face New Charges in Hunter Biden Probe left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 10 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Two Ex-FBI Officials Face New Charges in Hunter Biden Probe biased?
- Two Ex-FBI Officials Face New Charges in Hunter Biden Probe is one event reported by 11 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Two Ex-FBI Officials Face New Charges in Hunter Biden Probe?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Two Ex-FBI Officials Face New Charges in Hunter Biden Probe?
- 11 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What are the new charges against the former FBI officials?
- The Department of Justice has added charges of obstruction of justice to the existing accusations that Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides lied to Congress. These new charges were filed shortly before a court hearing.
- Who are Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides?
- Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides are two former FBI officials. They are accused of lying to Congress about their involvement in investigations concerning Hunter Biden and his laptop.
- What has been the reaction to the new charges?
- The defense lawyers for the former FBI officials have criticized the new charges. They described the action as unusual and "outrageous government conduct," particularly because the charges were filed just before a court hearing.
Read it at the source
11 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
5- Ex-FBI official's lawyers slam unusual new criminal charge: 'Outrageous government conduct' (opens CNBC in a new tab)
- Scrambling Pirro team walks back Hunter Biden claims hours before court showdown (opens Raw Story in a new tab)
- Ex-FBI officials charged in the case about Hunter Biden's laptop are due back in court (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Ex-FBI officials due back in court in Hunter Biden laptop case (opens ABC News in a new tab)
- Two Former FBI Officials Charged With Lying to Congress About Hunter Biden's Laptop (opens lawcommentary.com in a new tab)
lawcommentary.com — is lawcommentary.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
4- DOJ files new charges accusing ex-FBI officials of obstructing, lying to Congress over roles in Hunter Biden probe (opens CBS News in a new tab)
- DOJ Escalates Scrutiny of Ex-FBI Officials Over 2020 Hunter Biden Cover-Up (opens Internewscast in a new tab)
Internewscast — is Internewscast biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Former FBI officials face court over Hunter Biden laptop investigation (opens Newsweek in a new tab)
- Ex-FBI officials charged in the case about Hunter Biden's laptop are due back in court (opens KSAT 12 in a new tab)
Right
1Not rated
1How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

