Tyler Robinson asks judge to remove death penalty in Charlie Kirk shooting
Defence argues the shooter hit only the intended target at a Utah event attended by thousands last September
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
Tyler Robinson, accused of fatally shooting of Charlie Kirk, appears during a hearing in 4th District Court in Provo, Utah, on June 12, 2026. (Francisco Kjolseth /The Salt Lake Tribune via AP, Pool, File)
Photograph: Associated Press News (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Tyler Robinson’s lawyers filed a motion to remove the death penalty as a possible sentence, arguing he hit only the intended target at a Utah Valley University event on 10 September 2025.
- Prosecutors say DNA evidence ties Robinson to the suspected murder weapon and that he confessed to his roommate.
- Judge Tony Graf will decide on 1 September whether the case proceeds to trial after closing arguments.
- The defence disputes that Robinson targeted Kirk over his political views, citing a lack of evidence beyond one statement to his roommate.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 24 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 25 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
56/100
Craft
95/100
Hype
15/100
25 sources · methodology
Lawyers for Tyler Robinson, charged with killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk, have asked a Utah judge to block the death penalty in the case. They argue that Robinson hit only the intended target during the shooting at a Utah Valley University event on 10 September 2025. The defence says prosecutors have not proven that other attendees were endangered, which is required under state law for a capital crime.
Prosecutors allege Robinson told his roommate he killed Kirk because he “had enough of his hatred.” The defence disputes this as sufficient evidence of motive, noting searches of Robinson’s apartment, computers and telephone found nothing else to support the claim. Prosecutors presented DNA evidence linking Robinson to the suspected murder weapon and say he confessed. Robinson has not entered a plea.
Closing arguments in the preliminary hearing are scheduled for 1 September. Judge Tony Graf will then decide whether the case proceeds to trial. Robinson turned himself in a day after the shooting. His lawyers previously tried to remove the death penalty after prosecutors were found in contempt of court for discussing the case with the media, but Graf rejected the request.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated digests mention the prosecution’s allegation that Robinson confessed to his roommate. None of the centre-rated digests mention the defence’s claim that searches of Robinson’s apartment, computers and telephone found no evidence beyond one statement about Kirk’s political views.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 12 Aug 2026, 17:30, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
10 rated outlets
- The Associated Press, whose full report is printed below, led on the defence argument that Robinson “hit the intended target” and did not endanger others. It carried the defence’s claim that searches of Robinson’s apartment and devices found no evidence beyond one statement to his roommate about Kirk’s political views. The AP also reported that prosecutors presented DNA evidence linking Robinson to the weapon and that his lawyers did not address the DNA in their latest filing.
- The Salt Lake Tribune’s digest, the only other left-rated report with detail, focused on Robinson’s request to block the death penalty and dismiss charges. None of the left-rated digests mentioned the prosecution’s allegation that Robinson confessed to his roommate.
Centre
12 rated outlets
- All 12 centre-rated digests led on the defence’s argument that Robinson should not face the death penalty because he hit only the intended target. WPLG, whose full report is printed below, carried the defence’s claim that prosecutors had not proven other attendees were endangered. It also reported that prosecutors presented DNA evidence and that Robinson’s lawyers questioned its reliability but did not offer an alternative theory for the killing.
- None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the prosecution’s allegation that Robinson confessed to his roommate. None carried the defence’s claim that searches of Robinson’s devices found no evidence beyond one statement about Kirk’s political views.
Right
2 rated outlets
- Fox News’s digest led on Robinson’s request to remove the death penalty, framing it as an argument that prosecutors failed to establish probable cause for the aggravating factor. The Post Millennial’s digest quoted the defence’s admission that the shooter was on a nearby rooftop for 35-44 seconds before firing. Neither digest mentioned the prosecution’s DNA evidence or the defence’s claim that searches of Robinson’s devices found no evidence beyond one statement.
Read it at the source
25 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
10- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens ElliotLakeToday.com in a new tab)
ElliotLakeToday.com — is ElliotLakeToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens Bay Today in a new tab)
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens Sudbury in a new tab)
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens Orillia Matters in a new tab)
Orillia Matters — is Orillia Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens SooToday.com in a new tab)
SooToday.com — is SooToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens Rocky Mountain Outlook in a new tab)
Rocky Mountain Outlook — is Rocky Mountain Outlook biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Defense in Charlie Kirk’s killing say shooter hit the ‘intended target,’ did not endanger others (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens Richmond Register in a new tab)
Richmond Register — is Richmond Register biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 2 more
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Charlie Kirk shooting: Tyler Robinson asks judge to block death penalty, dismiss charges (opens Salt Lake Tribune in a new tab)
Salt Lake Tribune — is Salt Lake Tribune biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
12- Defense in Charlie Kirk’s killing say shooter hit the ‘intended target,’ did not endanger others (opens meadowlakeNOW in a new tab)
meadowlakeNOW — is meadowlakeNOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'inten (opens WBAL in a new tab)
- Defense in Charlie Kirk’s killing say shooter hit the ‘intended target,’ did not endanger others (opens CFJC Today Kamloops in a new tab)
CFJC Today Kamloops — is CFJC Today Kamloops biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens City News in a new tab)
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter hit the 'intended target,' did not endanger others (opens WPLG in a new tab)
- Defense in Charlie Kirk’s killing say shooter hit the ‘intended target,’ did not endanger others (opens Battlefords NOW in a new tab)
Battlefords NOW — is Battlefords NOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Charlie Kirk murder: Suspect Tyler Robinson’s lawyers tell judge to take potential death penalty off table (opens LiveNOW from FOX in a new tab)
LiveNOW from FOX — is LiveNOW from FOX biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 4 more
- Charlie Kirk murder: Suspect Tyler Robinson’s lawyers tell judge to take potential death penalty off table (opens Fox5 DC in a new tab)
- Charlie Kirk murder: Suspect Tyler Robinson’s lawyers tell judge to take potential death penalty off table (opens WOFL in a new tab)
- Charlie Kirk murder: Suspect Tyler Robinson’s lawyers tell judge to take potential death penalty off table (opens Fox 10 Phoenix in a new tab)
Fox 10 Phoenix — is Fox 10 Phoenix biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Charlie Kirk murder: Suspect Tyler Robinson’s lawyers tell judge to take potential death penalty off table (opens WAGA in a new tab)
Right
2- Accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson asks judge to take potential death penalty off table (opens Fox News in a new tab)
- BREAKING: Tyler Robinson defense admits state’s evidence shows Charlie Kirk shooter fired shot from nearby rooftop at UVU (opens The Post Millennial in a new tab)
The Post Millennial — is The Post Millennial biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
1Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Tyler Robinson asks judge to remove death penalty in Charlie Kirk…?
- Of the 24 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 42% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 8% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 25. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Tyler Robinson asks judge to remove death penalty in Charlie Kirk… left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 24 rated outlets on this story, 42% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 8% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Tyler Robinson asks judge to remove death penalty in Charlie Kirk… biased?
- Tyler Robinson asks judge to remove death penalty in Charlie Kirk shooting is one event reported by 25 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which outlets covered Tyler Robinson asks judge to remove death penalty in Charlie Kirk…?
- 25 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is Tyler Robinson accused of?
- Tyler Robinson is accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a Utah Valley University event on 10 September 2025. Prosecutors say DNA evidence links him to the weapon and that he confessed to his roommate. He has not entered a plea.
- Why does the defence want the death penalty removed?
- Robinson’s lawyers argue he should not face the death penalty because he hit only the intended target and did not endanger other attendees. Under Utah law, this is required for a capital crime. They also dispute that he targeted Kirk over his political views.
- What happens next in the case?
- Closing arguments are scheduled for 1 September. Judge Tony Graf will then decide whether the case proceeds to trial. If it does, Robinson could still face the death penalty unless the judge rules otherwise.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
,regionOfInterest=(1193,689)&hash=19cd371cf17db6056720eed3a89f6c95e51b5edae4fbefc0b4aa9790a3420721)

