Skip to the story
All stories

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuses questions on Reflecting Pool case

Pirro repeatedly shouted 'no' when asked about a case President Trump wants revisited.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, September 9, 2026 in Washington.Finn Gomez/Getty Images

What this story says

  • U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro refused to answer questions about the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case.
  • Pirro repeatedly interrupted reporters and yelled 'No! No and no! How many times do I have to say no?!'
  • President Donald Trump had demanded Pirro revisit the dismissed case against former Olympian David Hearn.
  • Pirro's office had initially accused Hearn of vandalism but later dismissed the case after determining damage was due to shoddy construction.

Who covered it

Left 73%(11)Centre 14%(2)Right 13%(2)

Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 16 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

68/100

16 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 2 of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro repeatedly refused to answer questions about the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case during a news conference. President Donald Trump had demanded Pirro revisit the dismissed case against former Olympian David Hearn. Pirro's office had initially accused Hearn of vandalism but later dismissed the case after determining damage was due to shoddy construction.

When reporters attempted to ask about the case, Pirro interrupted them. In exchanges reported by ABC News, she responded to a question about revisiting the case by saying, 'Ah -- why did I know that was coming?' When pressed again, Pirro stated, 'No, I'm not going there! Don't even go there.' At one point, Pirro yelled, 'No! No and no!.... How many times do I have to say no?!' She also said, 'I am not talking about that.'

Pirro's office had initially charged Hearn with vandalism in July, but dismissed the case in August. Pirro's office stated in a filing that damage to the Reflecting Pool was likely caused by 'botched' installation rather than vandals. President Trump expressed disappointment with Pirro's handling of the case and did not rule out firing her, stating she 'choked' and urging her to 're-visit' the dismissal.

Coverage disagreements

MS NOW reported that Pirro's office had accused David Hearn of vandalizing the structure in June, while ABC News stated Pirro's office had accused Hearn of vandalism in August. MS NOW also reported that Hearn is 67 years old, a detail not mentioned in the ABC News report.

What the coverage left out

None of the left- or centre-rated reports mentioned the $245 million cryptocurrency racketeering case that U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro had called a news conference to announce.

Coverage settled. We checked this 59 times and stopped on 15 Sept 2026, 13:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuses questions on Reflecting Pool case
MS NOWLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

11 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports focused on U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro's repeated refusals to answer questions about the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case. Multiple reports highlighted Pirro's frustrated outbursts, quoting her yelling, 'No! No and no!.... How many times do I have to say no?!' The left-rated outlets also emphasised President Donald Trump's demand that Pirro revisit the dismissed case and his disappointment with her handling of it, with ABC News quoting Trump's social media post urging Pirro to 're-visit her hastily made decision'.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated report from The Hill led with Pirro telling a reporter, 'I'm not going there' when asked about the Reflecting Pool case. The digest noted Pirro's refusal to answer questions and the involvement of President Trump in demanding she revisit the case.

Right

2 rated outlets

We have not written our reading of the right coverage of this story. The right-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover US Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuses questions on Reflecting Pool case?
Of the 15 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 73% are rated left, 14% are rated centre, 13% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 16. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is US Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuses questions on Reflecting Pool case left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 73% of the 15 rated outlets on it are rated left — so far this is a story carried mostly by the left. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
Is the coverage of US Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuses questions on Reflecting Pool case biased?
US Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuses questions on Reflecting Pool case is one event reported by 16 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting US Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuses questions on Reflecting Pool case?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered US Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuses questions on Reflecting Pool case?
16 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why did U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro refuse to answer questions?
Jeanine Pirro repeatedly refused to answer reporters' questions about the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case. She became visibly frustrated, at one point yelling, 'No! No and no! How many times do I have to say no?!' This occurred at a news conference where she was expected to discuss unrelated matters.
What is the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case?
The case involved former Olympian David Hearn, who was accused by Pirro's office of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. Pirro's office later dismissed the case, stating that damage was likely due to shoddy construction rather than vandalism. President Donald Trump had publicly urged Pirro to revisit the dismissed case.
What was President Trump's reaction to the case?
President Donald Trump expressed disappointment with Jeanine Pirro's handling of the Reflecting Pool case, stating she 'choked' and urging her to 're-visit' her decision to dismiss the charges. He did not rule out firing her from her position as U.S. Attorney.

Read it at the source

16 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

11
Show 3 more

Centre

2

Right

2

Not rated

1

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Pirro on Reflecting Pool case | MediaBias News