Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics30 outlets ran this3 min read

US judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota’s full voter list

Federal court rejects Trump administration lawsuit seeking state voter registration data under election law

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
US judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota’s full voter list

What this story says

  • A federal judge dismissed the Department of Justice’s lawsuit seeking Minnesota’s full voter registration list, calling it a 'fishing expedition'.
  • The DOJ sued Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon in September 2025 after he refused to hand over the state’s voter rolls.
  • The case was part of a broader effort by the Trump administration, which filed 23 similar lawsuits against states over voter data.
  • The ruling leaves Minnesota’s voter rolls private, with no court order requiring their release.

Who covered it

Left 19%(5)Centre 55%(15)Right 26%(7)

Percentages are shares of the 27 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 30 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

54/100

Craft

59/100

Hype

15/100

30 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 5 of the 27 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by the US Department of Justice in September 2025 against Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon. The DOJ had demanded the state’s full voter registration list, arguing it was needed to ensure compliance with federal election law. Simon refused to comply, and the judge ruled the lawsuit lacked a valid legal basis.

The judge described the DOJ’s demand as a 'fishing expedition', a term used in US courts for lawsuits that seek broad information without a clear legal justification. The case was one of 23 similar lawsuits the Trump administration filed against states over voter data. None of those cases have succeeded, according to the Minnesota Reformer.

What the coverage left out

None of the centre-rated or right-rated digests mentioned that the DOJ had filed 23 similar lawsuits against states over voter data. The Minnesota Reformer was the only outlet whose digest included that figure.

Tags:#VoterRegistration#ElectionLaw#DepartmentOfJustice#MinnesotaPolitics#FederalLitigation

Coverage settled. We checked this 12 times and stopped on 23 Aug 2026, 05:30. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

5 rated outlets

  • All five left-rated outlets reported that a federal judge in Minnesota blocked the US Department of Justice from obtaining the state’s full voter registration list. The ruling marked the 23rd consecutive loss for the DOJ in similar cases across the country.
  • The Minnesota Reformer, Alternet, and Joe.My.God. led on the DOJ’s 0-23 record in these lawsuits. Alternet and Joe.My.God. included the judge’s description of the effort as a “fishing expedition,” quoting Democracy Docket. The Star Tribune and Lodinews.com did not mention the streak or the judge’s phrasing.
  • None of the digests from these outlets quoted Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon or included his reasoning for refusing the request. The Minnesota Reformer and Lodinews.com noted the DOJ sought unredacted data, including Social Security numbers and dates of birth.

Centre

15 rated outlets

  • All six centre-rated digests led on the judge’s description of the lawsuit as a 'fishing expedition'. None mentioned the 23 similar cases filed by the DOJ. The Fox 9 digest used the phrase 'Trump administration’ in its headline, while the other five centre-rated digests did not name the administration in their headlines or digests.

Right

7 rated outlets

  • All six right-rated digests led on the judge’s dismissal of the lawsuit and the phrase 'fishing expedition'. None mentioned the 23 similar cases filed by the DOJ. The Echo Press digest added that the DOJ had sued 'several other states' over the same issue, but did not specify the number or outcomes of those cases.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover US judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota’s full voter list?
Of the 27 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 19% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 26% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 30. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is US judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota’s full voter list left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 27 rated outlets on this story, 19% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 26% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of US judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota’s full voter list biased?
US judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota’s full voter list is one event reported by 30 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting US judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota’s full voter list?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered US judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota’s full voter list?
30 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why did the DOJ sue Minnesota over voter rolls?
The Department of Justice sued Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon in September 2025, demanding the state’s full voter registration list to check compliance with federal election law. Simon refused, and a federal judge dismissed the case, calling it a 'fishing expedition' with no clear legal basis.
How many states did the DOJ sue over voter data?
The Department of Justice filed 23 similar lawsuits against states seeking voter registration data, according to the Minnesota Reformer. None of those cases have succeeded, and the Minnesota lawsuit was dismissed in August 2026.
What did the judge say about the DOJ’s lawsuit?
The federal judge dismissed the DOJ’s lawsuit, describing it as a 'fishing expedition'. This term refers to lawsuits that seek broad information without a specific legal justification. The ruling blocked the DOJ’s demand for Minnesota’s voter rolls.

Read it at the source

30 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

5

Centre

15
Show 7 more

Right

7

Not rated

3

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
Supreme Court to hear Trump-era immigration detention case3 min readSupreme Court to hear Trump-era immigration detention caseRead storyDOJ probes Texas Majority PAC over $25 voting‑class scheme3 min readDOJ probes Texas Majority PAC over $25 voting‑class schemeRead storyRepublican sues Jack Smith over 'phone records' subpoena3 min readSenator Blackburn sues Jack Smith over phone recordsRead story
Federal judge blocks DOJ demand for Minnesota voter rolls | MediaBias News