U.S. Navy considers redesigning Ford-class carriers to match Trump’s preference for WWII-era look

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover U.S. Navy considers redesigning Ford-class carriers to match Trump’s…?

Of the 27 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 44% are rated left, 37% are rated centre, 19% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 38. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is U.S. Navy considers redesigning Ford-class carriers to match Trump’s… left or right?

Neither side dominates it. Of the 27 rated outlets on this story, 44% are rated left, 37% are rated centre, 19% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.

Is the coverage of U.S. Navy considers redesigning Ford-class carriers to match Trump’s… biased?

U.S. Navy considers redesigning Ford-class carriers to match Trump’s preference for WWII-era look is one event reported by 38 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting U.S. Navy considers redesigning Ford-class carriers to match Trump’s…?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered U.S. Navy considers redesigning Ford-class carriers to match Trump’s…?

38 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What is the U.S. Navy considering changing on its new aircraft carriers?

The U.S. Navy is evaluating whether to move the command tower, or island, on its Ford-class aircraft carriers from the rear of the ship toward the middle. The change would make the carriers resemble those used during World War II, following requests from President Donald Trump.

How much could the proposed redesign cost?

Previous studies during Trump’s first term found that moving the island could cost billions of dollars. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the proposed "Trump-class" warships could cost $2.75 trillion over 30 years, or $180 billion per ship.

Why does Trump want the carriers redesigned?

President Donald Trump has expressed a preference for the aesthetic of World War II-era carriers, according to current and former U.S. officials. The Navy’s review of the redesign is in response to Trump’s concerns about the "look" of the new Ford-class ships.

What are the potential consequences of the redesign?

Officials warn that moving the island could cause significant delays to the carrier programme and require billions of dollars in redesign costs. The change could also affect the ship’s buoyancy and weight, leading to further disruptions, according to a former U.S. Navy officer.