Skip to the story
All stories

US Pentagon names Confucius Institutes national security threat

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the move, citing intellectual property theft and infiltration.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks at a roundtable event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC [File: Alex Brandon/AP]

What this story says

  • The US Department of Defense has designated Confucius Institutes as a threat to national security.
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the designation, stating the institutes are propaganda tools that steal intellectual property.
  • Hegseth said 80 new propaganda cells across 30 universities have been identified and dismantled by the Pentagon.
  • The Chinese embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment.

Who covered it

Left 19%(5)Centre 23%(6)Right 58%(15)

Percentages are shares of the 26 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 30 of the 56 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

58/100

Craft

60/100

Hype

30/100

56 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 5 of the 26 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The US Department of Defense has designated Confucius Institutes, Chinese-funded cultural centres on university campuses, as a threat to US national security. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the move, stating the Pentagon added the organisations to its list of institutions that threaten national security. Washington has long accused the centres of serving as Chinese propaganda tools and has taken steps to crack down on them.

Hegseth stated that 80 new propaganda cells across 30 universities had appeared using different names and charters but with the same mission: to steal intellectual property and to infiltrate the minds of American students. He added that the Pentagon has systematically dismantled these organisations over the past two months. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment.

Conflicting details on the number of dismantled organisations

Al Jazeera and Channel News Asia, in their full reports, state that the Pentagon has systematically dismantled "every single one of these organisations." However, other reports, including digests from Khabarhub and Arab News, do not specify the number of organisations dismantled, and some, like IndexHR, mention that the Pentagon "banned and dismantled" them without providing a count.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated or centre-rated reports below mention the specific date Pete Hegseth announced the move, although Al Jazeera and Channel News Asia note it was on a Friday. The right-rated reports also do not specify the date of the announcement.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 24 Oct 2026, 08:15, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during an event at Sparrows Point Shipyard, in Baltimore County, Maryland, US, Oct 6, 2026. (Photo: Reuters/Eric Lee)
Channel News AsiaCentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

5 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports led with the Pentagon's designation of Confucius Institutes as a national security threat. These reports highlighted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's statements, particularly his claim that 80 new propaganda cells had emerged across 30 universities with the mission to steal intellectual property and infiltrate students' minds. Al Jazeera's full report quoted Hegseth saying the Pentagon had "systematically dismantled every single one of these organisations" over the past two months. IndexHR's digest reported Hegseth stating China had infiltrated American universities, and in.gr's digest mentioned the Pentagon banned and dismantled Chinese educational institutions to prevent them from "penetrating the consciousness of American students" through "propaganda."

Centre

6 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports focused on the Pentagon's designation of Confucius Institutes as a national security threat. These reports included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's accusations that the institutes were stealing intellectual property and spreading propaganda on American university campuses. Channel News Asia and Digi 24 both reported Hegseth's statement about 80 new propaganda cells across 30 universities with the same mission. TRT World's digest quoted Hegseth accusing the centres of trying to "steal intellectual property and to infiltrate the minds of American students."

Right

15 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports highlighted the Pentagon's designation of Confucius Institutes as a national security threat. These reports frequently mentioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's claims about the institutes being propaganda tools and the identification of new "propaganda cells." Malay Mail's digest stated the Pentagon put the institutes on a US security threat list. Protothema's digest reported Hegseth claiming 80 new cores were identified at 30 universities, aimed at stealing intellectual property. News-pravda.com's digest reported Hegseth announcing the introduction of "propaganda cells" sponsored by Chinese authorities into American universities, identifying 80 such organisations in 30 universities. Voz.us's digest stated Hegseth accused organisations related to these programs of trying to influence American students and obtain intellectual property.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover US Pentagon names Confucius Institutes national security threat?
Of the 26 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 19% are rated left, 23% are rated centre, 58% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 56. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is US Pentagon names Confucius Institutes national security threat left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 26 rated outlets on this story, 19% are rated left, 23% are rated centre, 58% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of US Pentagon names Confucius Institutes national security threat biased?
US Pentagon names Confucius Institutes national security threat is one event reported by 56 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting US Pentagon names Confucius Institutes national security threat?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered US Pentagon names Confucius Institutes national security threat?
56 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What are Confucius Institutes?
Confucius Institutes are Chinese-funded cultural centres located on university campuses in the United States. They are intended to promote Chinese language and culture. However, the US Department of Defense has designated them as a threat to national security.
Why has the Pentagon designated Confucius Institutes a threat?
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that Confucius Institutes are propaganda tools used to steal intellectual property and infiltrate the minds of American students. He announced that 80 new propaganda cells across 30 universities, operating under different names, have been identified and dismantled.
Did China respond to the designation?
The Chinese embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment from news outlets that reported on the Pentagon's designation of Confucius Institutes as a national security threat.

Read it at the source

56 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

5

Centre

6

Right

15
Show 7 more

Not rated

30
Show 22 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Confucius Institutes national security threat | MediaBias News