Skip to the story
All stories

War official says foreign adversaries fuel anti-AI movement

Under Secretary Emil Michael claims 'psyop' operations aim to slow US AI infrastructure development.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) (C) speaks as President Trump holds a press briefing with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (R) and other AI executives on September 29, 2026 at The White House. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

What this story says

  • A Department of War official claims foreign adversaries are conducting 'psyop' operations to fuel opposition to AI and data centers in the US.
  • Under Secretary Emil Michael stated that this movement aims to decrease AI infrastructure production and that adversaries want to slow US development.
  • Senator Ted Cruz suggested foreign countries could benefit by convincing Americans to oppose data centers, thereby increasing reliance on them for AI.
  • Popular Information reports that while some efforts to foment opposition exist, there is no evidence they have meaningfully shaped US public opinion.

Who covered it

Left 17%(1)Centre 16%(1)Right 67%(4)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

59/100

Hype

41/100

6 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

A top official at the Department of War has stated that foreign adversaries are conducting 'psyop' operations to fuel the movement against data centers and artificial intelligence in the United States. Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering Emil Michael warned that this opposition is being pushed by America's adversaries, who do not want the US to develop super intelligence ahead of them. Michael described data centers as the "electricity that fuels the superintelligence revolution" and a crucial part of maintaining the US lead in the artificial intelligence race.

Senator Ted Cruz echoed concerns about foreign influence, comparing the situation to Middle Eastern countries funding anti-fracking movements. He suggested that if foreign countries can convince Americans to oppose data centers, it would benefit them by increasing reliance on foreign AI. The New York Ledger also reported that lawmakers have raised questions about funding from American-born tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham into nonprofits now opposing data center development.

Disagreement on foreign influence impact

Popular Information reports that while some efforts to foment opposition to data centers exist, there is no evidence they have meaningfully shaped public opinion in the United States. The outlet states that a Gallup survey found over 70% of Americans oppose constructing data centers for artificial intelligence in their local area. Popular Information identifies the Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) as a source that popularized the 'Chinese psyop' claim, and notes that BPI's head of research has ties to the data center industry.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention the Gallup survey finding that over 70% of Americans oppose constructing data centers for artificial intelligence in their local area, a detail carried by the centre and left-rated reports. The right-rated digests also do not mention the Popular Information report's identification of the Bitcoin Policy Institute as a source that popularized the 'Chinese psyop' claim, nor its note about BPI's head of research having ties to the data center industry.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 7 times, most recently on 7 Oct 2026, 08:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • The left-rated report from Popular Information led on the claim that Republicans are insisting data center opponents are victims of a 'Chinese psyop.' It highlighted that while some efforts to foment opposition exist, there is no evidence they have meaningfully shaped US public opinion. The report detailed how the 'Chinese psyop' claim was popularized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, whose head of research has ties to the data center industry. It also noted that a Gallup survey found over 70% of Americans oppose constructing data centers in their local area.

Centre

1 rated outlet

  • The centre-rated report from The New York Ledger led with a top Department of War official stating that foreign adversaries are running 'psyop' operations to fuel the anti-data center and anti-artificial intelligence movement in the US. It included warnings from Under Secretary Emil Michael about adversaries pushing to decrease AI infrastructure production. The report also featured comments from Senator Ted Cruz on foreign countries benefiting from US reliance on them for AI and detailed funding from Neville Roy Singham into nonprofits opposing data center development.

Right

4 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports, all digests, led on the claim by a top Department of War official that foreign adversaries are running 'psyop' operations to fuel the anti-AI and anti-data center movement in the US. They highlighted Under Secretary Emil Michael's warning that this movement is pushed by America's adversaries and aims to decrease AI infrastructure production.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover War official says foreign adversaries fuel anti-AI movement?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 17% are rated left, 16% are rated centre, 67% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is War official says foreign adversaries fuel anti-AI movement left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of War official says foreign adversaries fuel anti-AI movement biased?
War official says foreign adversaries fuel anti-AI movement is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting War official says foreign adversaries fuel anti-AI movement?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered War official says foreign adversaries fuel anti-AI movement?
6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the main claim made by the Department of War official?
A top official at the Department of War stated that foreign adversaries are conducting 'psyop' operations to fuel opposition to artificial intelligence and data centers in the US. Under Secretary Emil Michael warned that this movement is pushed by America's adversaries who aim to decrease AI infrastructure production and slow US development.
What is Senator Ted Cruz's view on foreign influence and data centers?
Senator Ted Cruz suggested that foreign countries could benefit from the US relying on them for AI. He stated that by convincing Americans to oppose data centers, these countries could increase US dependence on their AI capabilities, which he views as detrimental to America.
Is there evidence that foreign influence is shaping US public opinion on data centers?
Popular Information reports that while some efforts to foment opposition to data centers exist, there is no evidence they have meaningfully shaped public opinion in the United States. The outlet noted that a Gallup survey found over 70% of Americans oppose constructing data centers for AI in their local area.

Read it at the source

6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

US War Official Claims Foreign Psyop | MediaBias News