Apollo Magazine media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media places Apollo Magazine in the centre. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is Apollo Magazine biased?
Ad Fontes Media places Apollo Magazine in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Apollo Magazine left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places Apollo Magazine in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Apollo Magazine reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Apollo Magazine are Ad Fontes Media: Very high factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Apollo Magazine has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Apollo Magazine’s own report linked underneath.
The Bayeux Tapestry, a 70-meter-long embroidery from the 11th century, has arrived in London for an exhibition at the British Museum. Tickets have sold out for months, with the museum anticipating one million visitors before the exhibition closes in July 2027. The tapestry depicts the Norman conquest of England in 1066.
Apollo Magazine reported it asThe Bayeux Tapestry takes Britain by storm (opens Apollo Magazine in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MediacenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Very high factuality
- Ad Fontes MediaveryHighCheck it
Who owns it
- Press HoldingsMedia Conglomeratedirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- apollo-magazine.com
- Seen publishing on
- apollo-magazine.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 1
- First seen
- 7 September 2026
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Apollo Magazine is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Apollo Magazine: its report arrived a median of 4 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 October 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 13 September 2026. Ratings pulled 8 October 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Apollo Magazine, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Apollo Magazine publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.