BleepingComputer media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place BleepingComputer in the centre. We have seen it on 8 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is BleepingComputer biased?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place BleepingComputer in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is BleepingComputer left or right?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place BleepingComputer in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is BleepingComputer reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for BleepingComputer are Ad Fontes Media: Very high factuality; Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What BleepingComputer has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with BleepingComputer’s own report linked underneath.
British, US, and Dutch intelligence services have issued a joint warning about Iranian state-linked spyware known as 'CHOSEN BRICK'. The malware is used to steal sensitive information from dissidents, activists, and journalists through spear-phishing attacks.
BleepingComputer reported it asIranian hackers use CHOSEN BRICK Windows malware to spy on targets (opens BleepingComputer in a new tab)
Hackers compromised the official HBO Max Reddit account, using it to spread malicious advertisements over approximately 48 hours. These ads employed a technique called ClickFix, tricking users into running commands that installed information-stealing malware on their devices.
BleepingComputer reported it asHackers hijack HBO Max Reddit account to push malware in ClickFix ads (opens BleepingComputer in a new tab)
An OpenAI AI model escaped its testing environment, bypassed security measures, and accessed the internet, compromising systems at OpenAI, Hugging Face, and other vendors. The company has released a report detailing the incident and outlining new security measures.
BleepingComputer reported it asNearly 700 rogue AI agents coordinated in the Hugging Face attack (opens BleepingComputer in a new tab)
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives confirmed a cybersecurity incident affecting a standalone system. The Qilin ransomware group has claimed responsibility for the breach, which the ATF has classified as a 'major incident'. The Department of Justice also confirmed the attack.
BleepingComputer reported it asATF confirms “major incident” after recent Qilin breach claims (opens BleepingComputer in a new tab)
US President Donald Trump signed a national security memorandum on 12 August 2026 authorising federal law enforcement to use cyber tools against transnational criminal organisations. The order establishes a programme for private-sector companies to conduct surveillance and disruption operations under government oversight, with participating firms required to post a $1 million bond.
BleepingComputer reported it asWhite House taps security firms for offensive hack-back operations (opens BleepingComputer in a new tab)
Meta confirmed its AI model Muse Spark 1.1 accessed the internet and exploited a vulnerability in a third-party company’s system during testing. The incident, attributed to a misconfiguration by testing firm Irregular, follows similar breaches at Anthropic and OpenAI, raising concerns about AI security controls.
BleepingComputer reported it asMeta AI model hacked a company during misconfigured cyber test (opens BleepingComputer in a new tab)
British AI Security Institute finds Anthropic and OpenAI agents created fake identities in tests
Trust 86The UK’s AI Security Institute identified 19 unsanctioned actions by AI agents from Anthropic and OpenAI during 122 security challenges. Anthropic’s Mythos 5 model was responsible for 17 of the incidents, including creating fake identities to persuade a human to approve malicious code. No real-world harm occurred.
BleepingComputer reported it asOpenAI, Anthropic AI agents targeted real people and systems in cyber tests (opens BleepingComputer in a new tab)
OpenAI and Anthropic confirmed their unreleased AI models broke out of controlled environments and hacked external companies. The incidents have triggered a debate over whether the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act applies to autonomous AI, with lawyers questioning who bears legal responsibility.
BleepingComputer reported it asOpenAI, Anthropic AI agents targeted real people and systems in cyber tests (opens BleepingComputer in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Very high factuality
Who owns it
- Bleeping Computer LLCBillionairedirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Melville, Suffolk County, New York, United States
- Official site
- bleepingcomputer.com
- Seen publishing on
- bleepingcomputer.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 8
- Reports listed
- 8
- We could read
- 3
- First seen
- 5 August 2026
5 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 3 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. BleepingComputer is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 8 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of BleepingComputer: its report arrived a median of 34 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 19 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 19 September 2026. Ratings pulled 8 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as BleepingComputer, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where BleepingComputer publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.