burytimes.co.uk media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place burytimes.co.uk in the centre. We have seen it on 7 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is burytimes.co.uk biased?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place burytimes.co.uk in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is burytimes.co.uk left or right?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place burytimes.co.uk in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is burytimes.co.uk reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for burytimes.co.uk are Ad Fontes Media: High factuality; Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What burytimes.co.uk has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with burytimes.co.uk’s own report linked underneath.
The board of the Kennedy Center voted to close the performing arts venue due to financial problems and a disagreement about naming the building after President Donald Trump. A judge had previously blocked the venue from being renamed.
burytimes.co.uk reported it asFencing goes up around Kennedy Centre amid closure row (opens burytimes.co.uk in a new tab)
The BRICS New Delhi Declaration condemned the April 22, 2025, terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. The statement called for zero tolerance towards state-sponsored cross-border terrorism and reaffirmed the commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms.
burytimes.co.uk reported it asBrics leaders voice concern over Middle East and condemn unilateral sanctions (opens burytimes.co.uk in a new tab)
IKEA is investing €1.2 billion to lower prices on hundreds of products across Europe. The initiative aims to make home furnishings more accessible amid rising living costs, with average reductions ranging from 15% to 25%. Iconic items like the KALLAX and BILLY ranges are included.
burytimes.co.uk reported it asWorld-famous furniture firm slashes prices on hundreds of products in 22 stores (opens burytimes.co.uk in a new tab)
Russia's Ministry of Defence announced preparations for large-scale strikes targeting Ukraine's energy infrastructure. Moscow stated these actions are in response to Ukrainian attacks on Russian civilian and energy facilities.
burytimes.co.uk reported it asAlmost 40 killed in major Russian attack on Kyiv region (opens burytimes.co.uk in a new tab)
A U.S. federal judge has postponed the trial of Abu Agila Mohammad Mas’ud Kheir Al-Marimi, who is charged in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The delay is due to newly discovered evidence that defense attorneys need to examine.
burytimes.co.uk reported it asJudge postpones US trial for Libyan man charged over Lockerbie bombing (opens burytimes.co.uk in a new tab)
Ed Miliband met US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington to discuss security, Ukraine and Gaza, while ignoring questions about his past criticism of Donald Trump as 'racist' and 'misogynistic'. The White House had reportedly expressed concerns over Miliband’s appointment.
burytimes.co.uk reported it asMiliband ignores questions about past views on Trump during Washington trip (opens burytimes.co.uk in a new tab)
Russian missile and drone strikes on Kyiv and its region killed over a dozen people and wounded others on 5 August 2026. The attacks destroyed Rozetka’s largest warehouse in Brovary, near Kyiv, and damaged homes in the Brovary district. No centre- or right-rated outlets covered the strikes.
burytimes.co.uk reported it asRussian missile and drone barrage in Ukrainian capital region kills at least 17 (opens burytimes.co.uk in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for burytimes.co.uk.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- United Kingdom
- Official site
- burytimes.co.uk
- Seen publishing on
- burytimes.co.uk
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 7
- Reports listed
- 7
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
7 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. burytimes.co.uk is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 7 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of burytimes.co.uk: its report arrived a median of 27 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 21 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 20 September 2026. Ratings pulled 6 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as burytimes.co.uk, also publishing from United Kingdom, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where burytimes.co.uk publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.