Chico Enterprise-Record media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Chico Enterprise-Record in the centre. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is Chico Enterprise-Record biased?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Chico Enterprise-Record in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Chico Enterprise-Record left or right?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Chico Enterprise-Record in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Chico Enterprise-Record reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Chico Enterprise-Record are Ad Fontes Media: High factuality; Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Chico Enterprise-Record has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Chico Enterprise-Record’s own report linked underneath.
A recent AP-NORC poll reveals that 64% of Americans feel artificial intelligence is advancing too quickly. The majority also believe it is crucial for AI to remain under human control and for workers to be protected.
Chico Enterprise-Record reported it asMost Americans think artificial intelligence is developing too fast, a new AP-NORC poll finds (opens Chico Enterprise-Record in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
Who owns it
- Digital First MediaCorporationdirect owner
- Alden Global CapitalPrivate Equityparent group
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Chico, Butte County, California, United States
- Official site
- chicoer.com
- Seen publishing on
- chicoer.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 8 October 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Chico Enterprise-Record is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Chico Enterprise-Record: its report arrived a median of 13 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 October 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 October 2026. Ratings pulled 8 October 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Chico Enterprise-Record, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Chico Enterprise-Record publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.