enfieldindependent.co.uk media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place enfieldindependent.co.uk in the centre. We have seen it on 7 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is enfieldindependent.co.uk biased?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place enfieldindependent.co.uk in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is enfieldindependent.co.uk left or right?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place enfieldindependent.co.uk in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is enfieldindependent.co.uk reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for enfieldindependent.co.uk are Ad Fontes Media: High factuality; Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What enfieldindependent.co.uk has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with enfieldindependent.co.uk’s own report linked underneath.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended President Donald Trump's decision to ban CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO from the White House. The outlets have filed a federal lawsuit, arguing the ban violates their First and Fifth Amendment rights.
enfieldindependent.co.uk reported it asPope warns ‘paradise of machines’ could undermine humanity as he visits France (opens enfieldindependent.co.uk in a new tab)
Pope Leo XIV visited the Maison Bakhita centre in Paris, an organisation supporting migrants and refugees. He spoke about the dignity of those who are exiled and urged coexistence, peace, and respect for human dignity.
enfieldindependent.co.uk reported it asPope warns ‘paradise of machines’ could undermine humanity as he visits France (opens enfieldindependent.co.uk in a new tab)
The United States, Denmark and Greenland plan to sign a security pact at the UN General Assembly next week. President Donald Trump says the deal gives the US permanent control over security matters, while other outlets report no sovereign US control. A joint working group will discuss future cooperation.
enfieldindependent.co.uk reported it asAndy Burnham congratulates Donald Trump and Mette Frederiksen on Greenland deal (opens enfieldindependent.co.uk in a new tab)
The BRICS New Delhi Declaration condemned the April 22, 2025, terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. The statement called for zero tolerance towards state-sponsored cross-border terrorism and reaffirmed the commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms.
enfieldindependent.co.uk reported it asBrics leaders voice concern over Middle East and condemn unilateral sanctions (opens enfieldindependent.co.uk in a new tab)
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History is commemorating the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks with an exhibit of artifacts. The display includes personal items from the day, presented openly due to fragility, as museum leadership navigates political criticism.
enfieldindependent.co.uk reported it asUS marks 25 years since the September 11 attacks (opens enfieldindependent.co.uk in a new tab)
Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies raided the homes of Iryna Mudra, deputy head of the Presidential Office, and former MP Vadim Stolar on 19 August 2026. The operation, named 'Forest Gump', targets a suspected criminal organisation involving current and former lawmakers and officials. No centre- or right-rated outlets covered the story.
enfieldindependent.co.uk reported it asZelensky sacks top aide amid corruption probe as ex-minister demands elections (opens enfieldindependent.co.uk in a new tab)
Actress Hayden Panettiere, 36, was found dead in her Greenville, South Carolina apartment on 16 August 2026. Police and the coroner’s office reported no signs of foul play. Her father confirmed her death in a statement to ABC News, and tributes followed from co-stars and fans.
enfieldindependent.co.uk reported it asHeroes, Nashville and Scream star Hayden Panettiere dies aged 36 (opens enfieldindependent.co.uk in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for enfieldindependent.co.uk.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- United Kingdom
- Official site
- enfieldindependent.co.uk
- Seen publishing on
- enfieldindependent.co.uk
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 7
- Reports listed
- 7
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 17 August 2026
7 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. enfieldindependent.co.uk is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 7 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of enfieldindependent.co.uk: its report arrived a median of 3 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 1 October 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 1 October 2026. Ratings pulled 16 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as enfieldindependent.co.uk, also publishing from United Kingdom, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where enfieldindependent.co.uk publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.