Film Daily media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media places Film Daily in the centre. We have seen it on 4 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Film Daily biased?
Ad Fontes Media places Film Daily in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Film Daily left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places Film Daily in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Film Daily reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Film Daily are Ad Fontes Media: Very low factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Film Daily has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Film Daily’s own report linked underneath.
Patrick Stewart, the British actor famous for his roles as Captain Jean-Luc Picard in 'Star Trek' and Professor Charles Xavier in 'X-Men', has died at the age of 86. His death was announced by his family.
Film Daily reported it asCharles Xavier actor Patrick Stewart dies at 86 (opens Film Daily in a new tab)
The Pentagon has released its seventh set of UFO documents, featuring a report of a black triangular object seen by FBI agents. The craft reportedly moved at high speed without sound or visible propulsion over a sensitive US site.
Film Daily reported it asUFO files release: Triangular craft ascent examined (opens Film Daily in a new tab)
Jon Stewart will continue as host of 'The Daily Show' on Monday nights through December 2028, Skydance announced. His return in February 2024 led to increased ratings for the show.
Film Daily reported it asJon Stewart to remain ‘Daily Show’ host through 2028 (opens Film Daily in a new tab)
Actor Danny Trejo has responded to criticism regarding his role in the Daily Wire film 'Pawn Shop.' Trejo stated he is a proud supporter of his community and is pro-immigrant, but not pro-ICE, emphasizing his job is to tell a story.
Film Daily reported it asBehind the Danny Trejo movie backlash (opens Film Daily in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MediacenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Very low factuality
- Ad Fontes MediaveryLowCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Film Daily.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Colombia
- Official site
- filmdaily.co
- Seen publishing on
- filmdaily.co
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 4
- Reports listed
- 4
- We could read
- 1
- First seen
- 23 September 2026
3 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 1 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Film Daily is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 4 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Film Daily: its report arrived a median of 19 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 7 November 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 5 November 2026. Ratings pulled 23 October 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Film Daily publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.