Is Freethought Blogs biased?
Freethought Blogs is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Freethought Blogs biased?
Freethought Blogs is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Freethought Blogs left or right?
Freethought Blogs is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Freethought Blogs reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Freethought Blogs. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Freethought Blogs has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Freethought Blogs’s own report linked underneath.
US Attorney General Todd Blanche publicly supported Jeanine Pirro after President Donald Trump criticised her handling of a vandalism case at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The Trump administration had fast-tracked a $14.7 million renovation of the pool ahead of Fourth of July celebrations, but the case was dismissed after allegations of flawed contractor work.
Freethought Blogs reported it asTrump and Pirro’s Lincoln pool problem may well get worse (opens Freethought Blogs in a new tab)
Marco Rubio appeared on the Katie Miller podcast in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, where he praised Pop-Tarts as a major American invention and joked about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s diet. His wife, Jeanette, interrupted to highlight Rubio’s own preference for sugary and fast food. Outlets diverged on whether the remarks were lighthearted or politically pointed.
Freethought Blogs reported it asAnother reason that the US is running short of weapons for the Iran war (opens Freethought Blogs in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Freethought Blogs. We asked on 10 August 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Freethought Blogs.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- freethoughtblogs.com
- Seen publishing on
- freethoughtblogs.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 7 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Freethought Blogs has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, we logged no report earlier than Freethought Blogs’s on 1 of them. Overall it filed a median of 2 days after the earliest report we logged.
Measured 17 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 17 August 2026. Ratings pulled 10 August 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Freethought Blogs publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.