Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia

indy100- Independent media bias and reliability

Ad Fontes Media places indy100- Independent as leaning left. We have seen it on 50 published stories of ours.

Leans leftLow factuality

The short answers

Is indy100- Independent biased?

Ad Fontes Media places indy100- Independent as leaning left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.

Is indy100- Independent left or right?

Ad Fontes Media places indy100- Independent as leaning left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.

Is indy100- Independent reliable?

The factual-reliability assessments we hold for indy100- Independent are Ad Fontes Media: Low factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.

What indy100- Independent has been covering

Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with indy100- Independent’s own report linked underneath.

Who says so

One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.

How reliably it reports fact

A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.

Low factuality

Who owns it

  • Independent Digital News and Media LimitedCorporationdirect owner

Where it publishes from

Publishes from
London, Greater London, England, United Kingdom
Official site
indy100.com
Seen publishing on
indy100.com
Access
Free to read

What we have seen ourselves

Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.

Stories
50
Reports listed
52
We could read
2
First seen
8 August 2026

50 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 2 we could open, not on everything it published.

On 16 of those stories, outlets rated left were largely absent from the coverage and indy100- Independent ran the story anyway.

Across the 50 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, we logged no report earlier than indy100- Independent’s on 1 of them. Overall it filed a median of 34 hours after the earliest report we logged.

Measured 8 November 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 November 2026. Ratings pulled 11 October 2026.

Other outlets rated the same way

Publishers carrying the same published leaning as indy100- Independent, also publishing from United Kingdom, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.

Think this page is wrong?

The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.

What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where indy100- Independent publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.

Report something wrong on this page

Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.

Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.

indy100- Independent media bias and reliability | MediaBias News