Kent Online media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Kent Online in the centre. We have seen it on 4 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Kent Online biased?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Kent Online in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Kent Online left or right?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Kent Online in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Kent Online reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Kent Online are Ad Fontes Media: High factuality; Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Kent Online has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Kent Online’s own report linked underneath.
US President Donald Trump's visit to Ireland on September 12 and 13 will be supported by a large-scale security and policing operation. An Garda Síochána has declared the event extraordinary to manage staffing and resources for the extensive plan.
Kent Online reported it asTrump visit involves ‘one of biggest’ policing operations in Ireland (opens Kent Online in a new tab)
The Bayeux Tapestry, a 70-meter-long embroidery from the 11th century, has arrived in London for an exhibition at the British Museum. Tickets have sold out for months, with the museum anticipating one million visitors before the exhibition closes in July 2027. The tapestry depicts the Norman conquest of England in 1066.
Kent Online reported it asKent council demands Bayeux Tapestry priority booking for residents (opens Kent Online in a new tab)
French President Emmanuel Macron is in London to view the Bayeux Tapestry with King Charles III and meet UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham. They will discuss migration, the Russia-Ukraine war, and UK-EU relations. The tapestry is on loan from France for a 10-month exhibition.
Kent Online reported it asKing says ‘what is past is prologue’ after Bayeux tour with Macron and Burnham (opens Kent Online in a new tab)
The Royal Navy conducted a 72-hour operation tracking Russian warships and sanctioned cargo vessels. British naval operations to monitor Russian activity have increased by 25% this year compared to last year.
Kent Online reported it asNavy tracks Russian warships in English Channel during ‘intense’ operation (opens Kent Online in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
Who owns it
- Iliffe Media LtdMedia Conglomeratedirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Kent, England, United Kingdom
- Official site
- kentonline.co.uk
- Seen publishing on
- kentonline.co.uk
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 4
- Reports listed
- 4
- We could read
- 1
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
3 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 1 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Kent Online is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 4 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Kent Online: its report arrived a median of 28 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 20 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 17 September 2026. Ratings pulled 4 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Kent Online, also publishing from United Kingdom, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Kent Online publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.