Is Kimberley Daily Bulletin biased?
The rating organisations do not give Kimberley Daily Bulletin one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Centre; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is Kimberley Daily Bulletin biased?
The rating organisations do not give Kimberley Daily Bulletin one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Centre; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Kimberley Daily Bulletin left or right?
The rating organisations do not give Kimberley Daily Bulletin one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Centre; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is Kimberley Daily Bulletin reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Kimberley Daily Bulletin are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Kimberley Daily Bulletin has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Kimberley Daily Bulletin’s own report linked underneath.
Donald Trump suggested reviving the Keystone XL pipeline in a Truth Social post on 18 August 2026, linking it to a trade deal with Canada. The project, cancelled by Joe Biden in 2021, would carry Canadian crude to the U.S. Gulf Coast. Its role in the negotiations remains unclear.
Kimberley Daily Bulletin reported it as'Indefensible': B.C. Premier Eby responds to collapsed Canada-U.S. trade talks - Kimberley Bulletin (opens Kimberley Daily Bulletin in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Kimberley Daily Bulletin.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- kimberleybulletin.com
- Seen publishing on
- kimberleybulletin.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 22 August 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
We have not seen Kimberley Daily Bulletin cover a story that outlets rated left were largely absent from.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Kimberley Daily Bulletin: its report arrived a median of 4 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 22 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 22 August 2026. Ratings pulled 22 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Kimberley Daily Bulletin, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Kimberley Daily Bulletin publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.