Lake Country Calendar media bias and reliability
The rating organisations do not give Lake Country Calendar one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Centre; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is Lake Country Calendar biased?
The rating organisations do not give Lake Country Calendar one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Centre; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Lake Country Calendar left or right?
The rating organisations do not give Lake Country Calendar one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Centre; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is Lake Country Calendar reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Lake Country Calendar are Ad Fontes Media: Very high factuality; Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Lake Country Calendar has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Lake Country Calendar’s own report linked underneath.
LNG Canada's partners have approved a $33 billion Phase 2 expansion, which will double the facility's production capacity to 28 million tonnes of LNG per year. The project is expected to create up to 4,000 construction jobs and hundreds of permanent positions.
Lake Country Calendar reported it asLNG Phase 2 in Kitimat gets go ahead in final investment decision (opens Lake Country Calendar in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Very high factuality
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Lake Country Calendar.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Kelowna, Central Okanagan, British Columbia, Canada
- Official site
- lakecountrycalendar.com
- Seen publishing on
- lakecountrycalendar.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 30 September 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
We have not seen Lake Country Calendar cover a story that outlets rated left were largely absent from.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Lake Country Calendar: its report arrived a median of 19 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 30 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 30 September 2026. Ratings pulled 30 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Lake Country Calendar, also publishing from Canada, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Lake Country Calendar publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.