Is LifeNews.com biased?
The bias data this site ingests places LifeNews.com on the right. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is LifeNews.com biased?
The bias data this site ingests places LifeNews.com on the right. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is LifeNews.com left or right?
The bias data this site ingests places LifeNews.com on the right. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Right.
Is LifeNews.com reliable?
The factuality data this site ingests describes LifeNews.com as low factuality. It reaches us without a named assessor, so it is an unattributed rating rather than our verdict. It does not guarantee that every report is correct.
What LifeNews.com has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with LifeNews.com’s own report linked underneath.
Kansas voters rejected a constitutional amendment that would have shifted the selection of state Supreme Court justices from gubernatorial appointment to direct election. The current process, involving a nominating commission and the governor, remains unchanged after the 5 August 2026 primary.
LifeNews.com reported it asKansas Supreme Court Will Remain Radically Pro-Abortion After Amendment is Defeated (opens LifeNews.com in a new tab)
Four consecutive polls show James Talarico ahead of Ken Paxton in the Texas Senate race, with leads ranging from two to three points. Republican groups have not reserved ad spending in the state, while Paxton’s campaign dismisses the results as premature.
LifeNews.com reported it asNational Pro-Life Group Endorses Ken Paxton Over Pro-Abortion James Talarico (opens LifeNews.com in a new tab)
Who says so
The lean above is carried in the coverage data this site ingests, which names no rater for it. We publish it because it is what the rest of the site groups LifeNews.com on, and we will not present it as an assessment by anyone in particular until we hold one.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Low factuality
The rating above reaches us without a named assessor, and is published as that rather than as anyone’s verdict.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for LifeNews.com.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- New York, New York, United States
- Seen publishing on
- lifenews.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
On 2 of those stories, outlets rated right were largely absent from the coverage and LifeNews.com ran the story anyway.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of LifeNews.com: its report arrived a median of 3 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 7 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 7 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as LifeNews.com, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.