Is Middle East Monitor biased?
The rating organisations do not give Middle East Monitor one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Leans left; Media Bias/Fact Check: Left. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is Middle East Monitor biased?
The rating organisations do not give Middle East Monitor one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Leans left; Media Bias/Fact Check: Left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Middle East Monitor left or right?
The rating organisations do not give Middle East Monitor one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Leans left; Media Bias/Fact Check: Left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is Middle East Monitor reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Middle East Monitor are Media Bias/Fact Check: Mixed factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Middle East Monitor has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Middle East Monitor’s own report linked underneath.
The US is negotiating with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping after five months of conflict, but Vice President JD Vance says Washington does not trust Tehran’s promises. Iran says the strait will reopen only if the US accepts its conditions, which remain unspecified.
Middle East Monitor reported it asUS expects Iran to ensure safe oil flow through Strait of Hormuz: Vance (opens Middle East Monitor in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Mixed factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckmixedCheck it
Who owns it
- QatarGovernmentdirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- London, Greater London, England, United Kingdom
- Official site
- middleeastmonitor.com
- Seen publishing on
- middleeastmonitor.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 1
- First seen
- 8 August 2026
On 1 of those stories, outlets rated left were largely absent from the coverage and Middle East Monitor ran the story anyway.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Middle East Monitor: its report arrived a median of 28 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 10 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 9 August 2026. Ratings pulled 10 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Middle East Monitor, also publishing from United Kingdom, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Middle East Monitor publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.