Security On Screen media bias and reliability
Security On Screen is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Security On Screen biased?
Security On Screen is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Security On Screen left or right?
Security On Screen is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Security On Screen reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Security On Screen. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Security On Screen has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Security On Screen’s own report linked underneath.
Sheikh Ahmed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, younger brother of Dubai's Ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, died on Monday, September 21, 2026, at the age of 76. Dubai has declared a 10-day official mourning period, with flags to be flown at half-mast.
Security On Screen reported it asDubai announces 10 days of mourning following death of Sheikh Ahmed bin Rashid Al Maktoum - Security On Screen by The Security Industry Group (opens Security On Screen in a new tab)
British, US, and Dutch intelligence services have issued a joint warning about Iranian state-linked spyware known as 'CHOSEN BRICK'. The malware is used to steal sensitive information from dissidents, activists, and journalists through spear-phishing attacks.
Security On Screen reported it asNCSC and allies expose spyware used by Iranian state actors to target dissidents, activists and journalists - Security On Screen by The Security Industry Group (opens Security On Screen in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Security On Screen. We asked on 17 September 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Security On Screen.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- securityonscreen.com
- Seen publishing on
- securityonscreen.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 17 September 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Security On Screen has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Security On Screen: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 22 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 22 September 2026. Ratings pulled 17 September 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Security On Screen publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.