stockholmcf.org media bias and reliability
Media Bias/Fact Check places stockholmcf.org as leaning left. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is stockholmcf.org biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places stockholmcf.org as leaning left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is stockholmcf.org left or right?
Media Bias/Fact Check places stockholmcf.org as leaning left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is stockholmcf.org reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for stockholmcf.org are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What stockholmcf.org has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with stockholmcf.org’s own report linked underneath.
A Turkish court has ordered the blocking of access to the website and social media accounts of the independent news portal T24. The decision stems from an investigation by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, citing content deemed 'LGBTQ+ propaganda'.
stockholmcf.org reported it asTurkish court shuts down independent news site T24 over alleged ‘LGBT propaganda’ - Stockholm Center for Freedom (opens stockholmcf.org in a new tab)
Journalist İrem Delice has been jailed in Turkey after a social media post by her newspaper, Aydın Denge, with the headline 'Erdoğan passed away' referred to a local woman named Gülşen Erdoğan. The Committee to Protect Journalists states Turkey's disinformation law is being used to criminalise journalism.
stockholmcf.org reported it asTurkish journalist arrested in ‘Erdoğan died’ social media post investigation - Stockholm Center for Freedom (opens stockholmcf.org in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Media Bias/Fact CheckleanLeftCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for stockholmcf.org.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- stockholmcf.org
- Seen publishing on
- stockholmcf.org
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 September 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
We have not seen stockholmcf.org cover a story that outlets rated left were largely absent from.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of stockholmcf.org: its report arrived a median of 3 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 15 November 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 6 October 2026. Ratings pulled 4 November 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as stockholmcf.org, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where stockholmcf.org publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.