Is The Gander biased?
The rating organisations do not give The Gander one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Left; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is The Gander biased?
The rating organisations do not give The Gander one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Left; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is The Gander left or right?
The rating organisations do not give The Gander one shared verdict in the records we hold. Their published ratings are Ad Fontes Media: Left; Media Bias/Fact Check: Leans left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is The Gander reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for The Gander are Media Bias/Fact Check: Mixed factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What The Gander has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with The Gander’s own report linked underneath.
Republican representatives Mike Lawler, Ryan Mackenzie, and Tom Barrett have not returned campaign donations from Rep. Max Miller, who faces a House Ethics Committee investigation over allegations of domestic violence and child abuse by his ex-wife. None of the right-rated outlets tracked by MediaBias News covered the story.
The Gander reported it asCongressman Max Miller's PAC backed John James, Tom Barrett (opens The Gander in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Mixed factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckmixedCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for The Gander.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- United States
- Official site
- gandernewsroom.com
- Seen publishing on
- gandernewsroom.com
- Access
- Metered: some articles are readable, some are not
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 13 August 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
We have not seen The Gander cover a story that outlets rated left were largely absent from.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of The Gander: its report arrived a median of 4 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 14 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 14 August 2026. Ratings pulled 13 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as The Gander, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where The Gander publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.