The German Marshall Fund of the United States media bias and reliability
Media Bias/Fact Check places The German Marshall Fund of the United States in the centre. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is The German Marshall Fund of the United States biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places The German Marshall Fund of the United States in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is The German Marshall Fund of the United States left or right?
Media Bias/Fact Check places The German Marshall Fund of the United States in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is The German Marshall Fund of the United States reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for The German Marshall Fund of the United States are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What The German Marshall Fund of the United States has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with The German Marshall Fund of the United States’s own report linked underneath.
Donald Trump said his Washington talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping deserved a 12‑out‑of‑10 rating and rejected claims he offered to sell U.S. weapons. Ambassador David Perdue asserted Trump raised the issue of arms sales and Taiwan, a point the president denied.
The German Marshall Fund of the United States reported it asAssessing the Trump-Xi Summit with Da Wei (opens The German Marshall Fund of the United States in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Media Bias/Fact CheckcenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for The German Marshall Fund of the United States.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Germany
- Official site
- gmfus.org
- Seen publishing on
- gmfus.org
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 October 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. The German Marshall Fund of the United States is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of The German Marshall Fund of the United States: its report arrived a median of 5 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 4 October 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 4 October 2026. Ratings pulled 4 October 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as The German Marshall Fund of the United States, also publishing from Germany, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where The German Marshall Fund of the United States publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.