The Warning with Steve Schmidt media bias and reliability
Media Bias/Fact Check places The Warning with Steve Schmidt as leaning left. We have seen it on 5 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is The Warning with Steve Schmidt biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places The Warning with Steve Schmidt as leaning left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is The Warning with Steve Schmidt left or right?
Media Bias/Fact Check places The Warning with Steve Schmidt as leaning left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is The Warning with Steve Schmidt reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for The Warning with Steve Schmidt are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What The Warning with Steve Schmidt has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with The Warning with Steve Schmidt’s own report linked underneath.
President Donald Trump's address to the United Nations General Assembly included numerous claims that have been disputed by experts and official reports. These assertions covered topics from U.S. munitions stockpiles and global oil reserves to his record on settling wars and climate change warnings.
The Warning with Steve Schmidt reported it asMAGA’s final days have begun (opens The Warning with Steve Schmidt in a new tab)
Ontario Premier Doug Ford stated that Donald Trump is untrustworthy, using colourful analogies to illustrate his point. Ford also called for unity in the face of a trade war.
The Warning with Steve Schmidt reported it asDonald Trump Just Started a Fight He Can't Win (opens The Warning with Steve Schmidt in a new tab)
Natalie Harp, a close aide to Donald Trump known as his 'human printer', has become a focus of media attention after a Democratic senator mocked their relationship. Reports describe her role in printing articles and social media posts for Trump, while her estranged brother calls her dedication unhealthy.
The Warning with Steve Schmidt reported it asTrump’s Natalie Harp meltdown (opens The Warning with Steve Schmidt in a new tab)
US Senator Jon Ossoff criticised Donald Trump’s executive assistant Natalie Harp in a campaign speech, calling her part of the president’s detachment from leadership. The White House responded with personal insults, while Harp’s influence and proximity to Trump drew scrutiny from outlets across the political spectrum.
The Warning with Steve Schmidt reported it asTrump’s Natalie Harp meltdown (opens The Warning with Steve Schmidt in a new tab)
US President Donald Trump flew secretly from Turkey on an alternate military aircraft last month after an Iranian assassination threat was detected, according to reports. The White House had stated he was aboard Air Force One, but the press was left on a decoy flight as part of an elaborate ruse to conceal his departure.
The Warning with Steve Schmidt reported it asDonald Trump is afraid (opens The Warning with Steve Schmidt in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Media Bias/Fact CheckleanLeftCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for The Warning with Steve Schmidt.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- steveschmidt.substack.com
- Seen publishing on
- steveschmidt.substack.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 5
- Reports listed
- 5
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 13 August 2026
5 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
We have not seen The Warning with Steve Schmidt cover a story that outlets rated left were largely absent from.
Across the 5 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of The Warning with Steve Schmidt: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 27 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 27 September 2026. Ratings pulled 12 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as The Warning with Steve Schmidt, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where The Warning with Steve Schmidt publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.