thecabin.net media bias and reliability
Media Bias/Fact Check places thecabin.net as leaning right. We have seen it on 6 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is thecabin.net biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places thecabin.net as leaning right. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is thecabin.net left or right?
Media Bias/Fact Check places thecabin.net as leaning right. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Right.
Is thecabin.net reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for thecabin.net are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What thecabin.net has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with thecabin.net’s own report linked underneath.
President Donald Trump's address to the United Nations General Assembly included numerous claims that have been disputed by experts and official reports. These assertions covered topics from U.S. munitions stockpiles and global oil reserves to his record on settling wars and climate change warnings.
thecabin.net reported it asTrump in address to world leaders at the UN defends his decision to start the war against Iran (opens thecabin.net in a new tab)
Scientists are engineering soybeans with deeper root systems to improve climate resilience and enhance carbon sequestration. The Salk Institute, with funding from the Bezos Earth Fund, is leading this research, identifying and editing genes to promote root growth and carbon storage.
thecabin.net reported it asScientists hope deeper-rooted soybeans can withstand climate extremes and store more carbon (opens thecabin.net in a new tab)
A whistleblower has raised alarms about a new U.S. Postal Service system designed to verify mail ballots, alleging it is being developed with inadequate testing and a rushed timeline. The system, intended to comply with a Trump executive order, could lead to the rejection of large numbers of ballots.
thecabin.net reported it asPostal Service work to comply with Trump's executive order is rushed, sloppy, whistleblower contends (opens thecabin.net in a new tab)
The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether construction of Donald Trump’s 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom can proceed after a preservation group sued, arguing the project violates federal law. The administration claims it is a military complex exempt from congressional approval.
thecabin.net reported it asPreservation group urges Supreme Court to suspend Trump's White House ballroom project (opens thecabin.net in a new tab)
A late-summer heat wave has placed roughly 97 million people from the central Plains to the Southeast under heat advisories, with temperatures feeling as hot as 46°C in some areas. Nighttime lows offer little relief, increasing health risks as schools reopen and outdoor workers face dangerous conditions.
thecabin.net reported it asOppressive heat, high humidity grip much of the US as students start a new school year (opens thecabin.net in a new tab)
The U.S. Defense Department has extended the National Guard deployment in Washington, D.C. until January 2029, with an estimated cost of $1.4 billion. The move, ordered by President Donald Trump in 2025, has drawn criticism from local officials and Democrats over costs and city autonomy.
thecabin.net reported it asGuard deployment to Washington into 2029 will cost roughly $1.4B, estimate shows (opens thecabin.net in a new tab)
A US appeals court ruled the Trump administration improperly terminated a $20 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, siding with nonprofits selected to distribute clean energy grants. The decision was paused to allow the EPA to appeal to the Supreme Court, leaving funds frozen for now.
thecabin.net reported it asDivided federal appeals court says Trump administration was wrong to terminate climate program (opens thecabin.net in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Media Bias/Fact CheckleanRightCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for thecabin.net.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- thecabin.net
- Seen publishing on
- thecabin.net
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 6
- Reports listed
- 6
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 5 August 2026
6 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
On 6 of those stories, outlets rated right were largely absent from the coverage and thecabin.net ran the story anyway.
Across the 7 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of thecabin.net: its report arrived a median of 25 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 23 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 23 September 2026. Ratings pulled 8 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as thecabin.net, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where thecabin.net publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.