Is thenewworld.co.uk biased?
Ad Fontes Media places thenewworld.co.uk as leaning left. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is thenewworld.co.uk biased?
Ad Fontes Media places thenewworld.co.uk as leaning left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is thenewworld.co.uk left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places thenewworld.co.uk as leaning left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is thenewworld.co.uk reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for thenewworld.co.uk. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What thenewworld.co.uk has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with thenewworld.co.uk’s own report linked underneath.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. debuted a YouTube cooking show on 30 July 2026, advocating a diet centred on red meat, whole milk, and eggs. His recipes, costing under $5 per serving, aim to combat obesity and chronic disease but clash with established research on saturated fats and heart health.
thenewworld.co.uk reported it asTesting the Robert F Kennedy Jr diet (opens thenewworld.co.uk in a new tab)
Conservatives select Joshua Bonehill-Paine as council candidate despite far-right convictions
Trust 62The Conservative Party has selected Joshua Bonehill-Paine, a former neo-Nazi convicted of racially aggravated harassment and malicious communications, as a candidate for Somerset Council. Party leader Kemi Badenoch defended the decision, citing his rehabilitation and Home Office certification to train police on antisemitism.
thenewworld.co.uk reported it asMeet the new face of Kemi Badenoch's Tories: a former neo-Nazi activist (opens thenewworld.co.uk in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MedialeanLeftCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for thenewworld.co.uk.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- thenewworld.co.uk
- Seen publishing on
- thenewworld.co.uk
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 5 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
We have not seen thenewworld.co.uk cover a story that outlets rated left were largely absent from.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of thenewworld.co.uk: its report arrived a median of 3 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 August 2026. Ratings pulled 8 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as thenewworld.co.uk, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where thenewworld.co.uk publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.