Tsarizm media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Tsarizm on the far right. We have seen it on 13 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Tsarizm biased?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Tsarizm on the far right. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Tsarizm left or right?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Tsarizm on the far right. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Right.
Is Tsarizm reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Tsarizm are Ad Fontes Media: Very low factuality; Media Bias/Fact Check: Low factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Tsarizm has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Tsarizm’s own report linked underneath.
US President Donald Trump announced plans to build two large military bases in Greenland during a speech at the UN General Assembly. An agreement was subsequently signed with Denmark and Greenland to strengthen security in the Arctic and North Atlantic.
Tsarizm reported it asPoland Wants A Permanent US Base — And They're Naming It Fort Trump (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
The UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Norway have jointly condemned Russia's elections held in occupied Ukrainian territories. They labelled the vote a 'sham' and a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty, stating it cannot alter the territories' status under international law.
Tsarizm reported it asRussia's First Wartime State Duma Vote Enters Day Two — Kremlin Extends Ballot To Annexed Ukrainian Territories For First Time (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
Lithuanian Defense Minister Robertas Kaunas announced that an explosive device was found on a drone shot down over Lithuania and has been neutralized. The drone had entered Lithuanian airspace from Belarus and was downed by Italian fighter jets.
Tsarizm reported it asNATO Jets Down Drone Over Lithuania After It Crossed From Belarus — Poland Recovers Another From Baltic Sea (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov indicated that trilateral negotiations concerning Ukraine could potentially resume in October. He stated that Russia does not rule out this possibility, though no specific dates have been set.
Tsarizm reported it asKremlin Says Ukraine Talks Could Resume In October — UAE Ready To Host As Peskov Warns Lithuania On Nuclear Arms (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
A fire broke out at an oil refinery in Russia's Yaroslavl region following a Ukrainian drone attack. The fire was extinguished, and regional officials reported that 65 drones were shot down over the area.
The Kremlin has stated it does not rule out resuming trilateral peace talks with Ukraine and the United States. However, Russian officials indicated it is too early to discuss specific locations or dates for any potential negotiations.
Tsarizm reported it asTrump To Call Putin First, Then Zelensky, After Envoys Deliver Moscow-Kyiv Briefing (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
Donald Trump has stated that Russian President Vladimir Putin does not intend to attack NATO territory. He also confirmed that US negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are travelling to Russia and Ukraine with a proposal to end the war.
Tsarizm reported it asTrump Says Putin Will Not Attack NATO — Witkoff And Kushner Land In Moscow With Peace Proposal In Hand (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
Russian spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that a trilateral summit of Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping could be held on the sidelines of the APEC meeting in Shenzhen on 18‑19 November 2026. The idea was discussed during a phone call on 8 September, but no outlet confirmed Trump’s attendance.
Tsarizm reported it asTrump Signals Readiness For Second Putin Summit — But Only When A Peace Deal Is On The Table (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
Russia's Ministry of Defence announced preparations for large-scale strikes targeting Ukraine's energy infrastructure. Moscow stated these actions are in response to Ukrainian attacks on Russian civilian and energy facilities.
Russia has threatened to strike British military targets inside and outside Ukraine in response to Ukrainian attacks using British-supplied missiles. The warning comes after the UK agreed to share secret technology for Ukraine to produce its own long-range missiles, a move France has also licensed.
Tsarizm reported it asRussia Threatens To Strike UK Over British Missiles Used By Ukraine - CDM - Human Reporters • Not Machines (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
CIA Director John Ratcliffe was reportedly in Moscow for meetings, according to US media. The Kremlin stated no talks with US envoys were scheduled for that week. A US military aircraft flew from Riga to Moscow.
Tsarizm reported it asCIA Director Ratcliffe Covertly Flew To Moscow For High-Level Meetings: Report (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that Russia reserves the right to consider British involvement in Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory as direct participation in the war. UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham reaffirmed Britain’s '100%' support for Ukraine, dismissing Moscow’s warnings.
Tsarizm reported it asLavrov: Russia Has The Right To Treat Britain As A War Participant After Ukrainian Strikes With British Drones (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
Ukrainian forces struck the Taneko oil refinery in Nizhnekamsk, Tatarstan, on 10 August 2026, killing at least 12 people and sparking a fire. Russia said it intercepted 456 drones across multiple regions. Outlets disagreed on the death toll and omitted details of the refinery’s output.
Tsarizm reported it asUkraine Drones Strike Oil Refinery City Of Nizhnekamsk In Tatarstan — 13 Dead, 38 Wounded, 1,000 Kilometers Into Russia - CDM - Human Reporters • Not Machines (opens Tsarizm in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Low factuality
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Tsarizm.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- tsarizm.com
- Seen publishing on
- tsarizm.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 13
- Reports listed
- 13
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 11 August 2026
13 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
On 2 of those stories, outlets rated right were largely absent from the coverage and Tsarizm ran the story anyway.
Across the 13 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Tsarizm: its report arrived a median of 26 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 26 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 25 September 2026. Ratings pulled 11 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Tsarizm, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Tsarizm publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.