utrop.no media bias and reliability
utrop.no is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 8 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is utrop.no biased?
utrop.no is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is utrop.no left or right?
utrop.no is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is utrop.no reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for utrop.no. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What utrop.no has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with utrop.no’s own report linked underneath.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deported Nicaraguan exile Jeffrey Jarquín, a former anti‑government protester who was tortured in prison, back to Nicaragua where authorities immediately returned him to the Modelo prison. The United Nations says over 800,000 people have fled the country, and Human Rights Watch reports 6,300 Nicaraguans were deported in early 2026.
utrop.no reported it asDeported to the Country He Fled From – Sent Straight Back to the Same prisonUproar - Den Plkilkurtalen Avis (opens utrop.no in a new tab)
Indian pilot Smit Machchhar has detailed a harrowing mid-flight assault by his co-pilot aboard a flydubai flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv. The co-pilot allegedly used an emergency axe and attempted to take control of the aircraft, which was diverted to Saudi Arabia.
utrop.no reported it asHe Opened the Door While He Was Bleeding – the Value Behind the Heroic actUtrop - Den Plurikulturalna Avis (opens utrop.no in a new tab)
The Supreme Court has permitted the Trump administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own. The court will hear arguments on the policy in December, with three liberal justices dissenting from the decision.
utrop.no reported it asUSAs Høyesterett Lar Trump Deportere Migranter Til tredjelandUtrop - Den Flerkulturelle Avisen (opens utrop.no in a new tab)
The United Kingdom and France have ended their 'one in, one out' migrant exchange agreement. The pilot programme, intended to reduce the number of migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats, was due to expire on October 1, 2026.
utrop.no reported it asEnd of Franco-British Migrant agreementUtrop - the Multicultural Newspaper (opens utrop.no in a new tab)
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History is commemorating the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks with an exhibit of artifacts. The display includes personal items from the day, presented openly due to fragility, as museum leadership navigates political criticism.
utrop.no reported it asUS Marks 25 Years Since Al-Qaeda Attacks on September 11thProclamation (opens utrop.no in a new tab)
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has won state elections in Saxony-Anhalt, according to exit polls. This marks the first time a far-right party has achieved such a result in modern German history, though it is unclear if the AfD can form a government alone.
utrop.no reported it asAfD Shakes Germany – Keeping the "Firewall" Against the Far Right? Exclamation (opens utrop.no in a new tab)
Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has targeted the Bauhaus art movement, calling it an 'aberration of modernism' in its election program. The attacks have drawn criticism from the country's culture minister, who compared the language to that used by Nazis.
utrop.no reported it asFar-Right AfD Party Faces Historic Victory in German State Elections (opens utrop.no in a new tab)
Denmark expects to be ready by the end of 2027 to send migrants without legal residency to a return hub outside the European Union. Five EU countries are meeting in Copenhagen to discuss the establishment and practical functioning of these deportation centres.
utrop.no reported it asCan Norway Be Connected to a Return Camp for 10,000 People? Exclamation (opens utrop.no in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed utrop.no. We asked on 2 October 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for utrop.no.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Norway
- Official site
- utrop.no
- Seen publishing on
- utrop.no
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 8
- Reports listed
- 8
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 2 September 2026
8 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. utrop.no has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 8 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of utrop.no: its report arrived a median of 3 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 19 October 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 12 October 2026. Ratings pulled 2 October 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where utrop.no publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.