Is Vatican News biased?
AllSides and Media Bias/Fact Check place Vatican News as leaning right. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is Vatican News biased?
AllSides and Media Bias/Fact Check place Vatican News as leaning right. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Vatican News left or right?
AllSides and Media Bias/Fact Check place Vatican News as leaning right. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Right.
Is Vatican News reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Vatican News are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Vatican News has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Vatican News’s own report linked underneath.
Christopher Alan Saunders, 76, was convicted on 20 August 2026 of 13 sex offences against two young Aboriginal men in Western Australia’s Kimberley region. The charges included sexual penetration without consent and indecent assaults, with offences spanning nearly a decade. Saunders was remanded in custody ahead of sentencing.
Vatican News reported it asAustralian Bishop pledges healing after predecessor’s abuse conviction (opens Vatican News in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Vatican News.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Vatican City
- Official site
- vaticannews.va
- Seen publishing on
- vaticannews.va
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 14 August 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
On 1 of those stories, outlets rated right were largely absent from the coverage and Vatican News ran the story anyway.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Vatican News: its report arrived a median of 12 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 14 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 14 August 2026. Ratings pulled 14 August 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Vatican News publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.