walfoot.be media bias and reliability
walfoot.be is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 11 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is walfoot.be biased?
walfoot.be is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is walfoot.be left or right?
walfoot.be is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is walfoot.be reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for walfoot.be. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What walfoot.be has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with walfoot.be’s own report linked underneath.
Jesús de Miguel, a 30-year-old Tenerife attacker, died on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. He had suffered a cardiac arrest following a collision with FC Andorra goalkeeper Jesús Owono during a second-division match on Monday. The player was taken to hospital after the incident.
walfoot.be reported it asWhat Does the Guard Risk After the Fatal Collision with Tenerife's Attacker? A Lawyer Wants to Be Clear? (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
UEFA has set a November 2 deadline for FIFA to release documents and answer questions concerning President Gianni Infantino's governance and business dealings. The demands follow concerns over investment proposals, the FIFA Peace Prize, and a player's red card.
walfoot.be reported it asUEFA Loses Patience with Gianni Infantino: FIFA President Has to Answer a Series of Questions (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
FIFA plans to amend its disciplinary regulations to prevent future controversies, following the revocation of Folarin Balogun's red card during the World Cup. A regulatory amendment was discussed at a FIFA Council meeting.
walfoot.be reported it asBelgium Keeps Pressure on: FIFA to Review Its Settlement After the Balogun Case (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Irish footballers again wore black armbands and bowed their heads during the Israeli national anthem before a Nations League match. Goalkeeper Caoimhín Kelleher refused to shake hands with Israel's captain, Dor Peretz.
walfoot.be reported it as"UEFA Should Intervene": Ireland's Radical Decision Following Its Tense Exchanges with Israel (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Ireland's pre-match press conference for their Nations League game against Israel was cut short after a journalist asked coach Heimir Hallgrimsson about alleged racism by Irish players. The team's communications officer intervened, calling the allegations untrue.
walfoot.be reported it asThe Tension Is Still at Its Peak Between Irish and Israelis: a Press Conference Derails (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Spain came from behind to beat England 3-2 in their Nations League opener at Wembley. Lamine Yamal scored early for Spain, but England led 2-1 before halftime. Harry Kane missed a penalty while England was ahead, and Mikel Oyarzabal scored the winning goal for Spain.
walfoot.be reported it asSpain Overturns England, Croatian Veterans on Mission: Summaries of the League of Nations (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Republic of Ireland manager Heimir Hallgrimsson stated his team was "playing against genocide" in upcoming Nations League matches against Israel. The Israel Football Association responded on social media, calling Hallgrimsson "stupid, ignorant and hypocritical". The fixture will be held at a neutral venue in Hungary.
walfoot.be reported it as"We Are Playing Against Genocide": a European Country Calls for Israel to Boycott Before the League of Nations (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Switzerland captain Granit Xhaka has admitted to acquiring a fake COVID-19 vaccination certificate. He will miss the upcoming international camp and UEFA Nations League fixtures as a result. The Swiss Football Association (SFV) made the decision jointly with the player.
walfoot.be reported it asFalse Covid Certificates: the Captain of Thomas Meunier and Malick Fofana in the Sights of Swiss Justice (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Donald Trump publicly supported FIFA president Gianni Infantino after three football confederations accused him of deception and threatened a boycott. Infantino withdrew a plan to sell World Cup commercial rights following backlash, but UEFA, CONCACAF and AFC demand his removal ahead of the 2027 election.
walfoot.be reported it asFIFA Would Make a Terrible Mistake: Donald Trump Maintains Support for Gianni Infantino (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Serbia's football association withdrew support for FIFA President Gianni Infantino's re-election bid, joining European opposition after FIFA's failed $4.2 billion tournament stake sale. The reversal came 70 days after Serbia initially backed Infantino, with the association calling for new leadership to restore trust in global football governance.
walfoot.be reported it asFIFA Reaffirms Its Support for Gianni Infantino and Admits that Mistakes Have Been Made (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Serbia's football association withdrew support for FIFA President Gianni Infantino's re-election bid, joining European opposition after FIFA's failed $4.2 billion tournament stake sale. The reversal came 70 days after Serbia initially backed Infantino, with the association calling for new leadership to restore trust in global football governance.
walfoot.be reported it asLuis Figo Fustige Gianni Infantino: "A Man Capable of Such an Act Has No Place in Football" (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
UEFA has threatened FIFA with legal action over Gianni Infantino's abandoned plan to sell a $4.2bn stake in World Cup profits to private investors. The proposal, withdrawn after global criticism, prompted UEFA to explore an alternative FIFA president candidate ahead of the March 2027 election.
walfoot.be reported it asOpen War Between Gianni Infantino and UEFA, Which Threatens FIFA President with Prosecution (opens walfoot.be in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed walfoot.be. We asked on 3 November 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for walfoot.be.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Belgium
- Official site
- walfoot.be
- Seen publishing on
- walfoot.be
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 11
- Reports listed
- 12
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
12 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. walfoot.be has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 11 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of walfoot.be: its report arrived a median of 30 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 4 November 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 4 November 2026. Ratings pulled 3 November 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where walfoot.be publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.