Is WTEN biased?
AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place WTEN in the centre. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is WTEN biased?
AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place WTEN in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is WTEN left or right?
AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place WTEN in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is WTEN reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for WTEN are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What WTEN has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with WTEN’s own report linked underneath.
Scientists using the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope in Hawaii have captured the most detailed images yet of the Sun’s visible surface, showing vortex-like plasma patterns ranging from 19 to 170 kilometres in diameter. The findings, published in Nature, could improve understanding of coronal mass ejections and space weather.
WTEN reported it asNew images of the sun show its surface in the finest detail yet (opens WTEN in a new tab)
Who says so
3 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
- Nexstar Media GroupMedia Conglomeratedirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Albany, Albany County, New York, United States
- Official site
- news10.com
- Seen publishing on
- news10.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. WTEN is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of WTEN: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 August 2026. Ratings pulled 8 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as WTEN, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.