Skip to the story
All stories

Mercury Shrinkage May Be 30% Greater Than Previously Thought

New study attributes planet's contraction to cooling iron core, leading to surface tightening.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
This composite image provided by NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington on Oct. 22, 2013, shows Mercury as it appeared to the Messenger spacecraft following a flyby of the planet. (NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington via AP)

What this story says

  • Mercury's diameter may have decreased by up to 14 miles (23 kilometers), a shrinkage potentially 30% larger than previously estimated.
  • Researchers attribute the planet's contraction to its internal iron core cooling and shrinking, which tightens the surface.
  • A new study published in Geophysical Research Letters used maps of Mercury's faults and surface roughness to reassess its shrinkage.
  • The European and Japanese BepiColombo spacecraft is scheduled to enter orbit around Mercury in November.

Who covered it

Left 33%(34)Centre 49%(38)Right 18%(18)

Percentages are shares of the 90 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 35 of the 125 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

41/100

125 sources · methodology

Scientists estimate that Mercury may be shrinking 30% more than previously believed, potentially losing up to 14 miles (23 kilometers) in diameter. This contraction is attributed to the planet's hot iron core cooling and contracting over billions of years, causing its surface to tighten.

The findings, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters by researchers from the German Aerospace Center's Institute of Space Research, were derived by comparing maps of Mercury's faults and geologic signs of contraction with newer maps detailing surface roughness. The study suggests that rougher areas, possibly obscured by impact debris, may have hidden the full extent of the shrinkage.

Coverage comparison

The European and Japanese BepiColombo spacecraft, designed for a fuller survey of Mercury, is expected to enter orbit around the planet in November.

What the coverage left out

None of the left, centre, or right-rated reports below mention the specific names of the researchers from the German Aerospace Center's Institute of Space Research, other than Gaku Nishiyama, who is identified as the study's lead author in the full report from CTV News.

Coverage settled. We checked this 365 times and stopped on 16 Sept 2026, 15:01. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

34 rated outlets

  • Reports from outlets rated left led on the finding that Mercury is shrinking more than previously thought. They highlighted the 30% greater shrinkage and the loss of up to 14 miles (23 kilometers) in diameter. Several reports mentioned the comparison of Mercury to a grape shriveling into a raisin.

Centre

38 rated outlets

  • Centrist reports also focused on the increased rate of Mercury's shrinkage, noting the potential loss of up to 14 miles (23 kilometers) in diameter. The cause, the cooling and contracting iron core, was frequently mentioned. Some reports included details about the BepiColombo mission's upcoming arrival at Mercury.

Right

18 rated outlets

  • The Daily Sentinel, MY Northwest, Washington Times and other right‑rated outlets led on a new German Aerospace Center study that finds Mercury’s shrinkage could be about thirty percent greater than earlier estimates. All eight digests describe the planet as small and wrinkled and repeat the percentage figure.
  • ABC’s digest added background on Mariner 10 and MESSENGER missions that first revealed Mercury’s surface scars. India Today noted that fresh BepiColombo observations might clarify the planet’s cooling record. tippinsights highlighted that recent impact‑debris could mask evidence, suggesting earlier calculations underestimated total contraction. These outlets each supplied distinct supplementary points.
  • None of the right‑rated digests mention any dissenting scientists, uncertainty ranges, or cost considerations related to the study. They also omit discussion of broader planetary implications beyond Mercury’s own history, leaving those aspects unreported in this set of coverage.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Mercury Shrinkage May Be 30% Greater Than Previously Thought?
Of the 90 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 33% are rated left, 49% are rated centre, 18% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 125. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Mercury Shrinkage May Be 30% Greater Than Previously Thought left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 90 rated outlets on this story, 33% are rated left, 49% are rated centre, 18% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Mercury Shrinkage May Be 30% Greater Than Previously Thought biased?
Mercury Shrinkage May Be 30% Greater Than Previously Thought is one event reported by 125 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Mercury Shrinkage May Be 30% Greater Than Previously Thought?
125 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
How much is Mercury shrinking?
Scientists estimate Mercury's diameter may have shrunk by up to 14 miles (23 kilometers), a figure potentially 30% greater than previously believed. This contraction is attributed to its internal iron core cooling and shrinking.
What is causing Mercury to shrink?
The shrinkage is caused by Mercury's hot iron core cooling and contracting over billions of years. This internal process tightens the planet's surface, similar to how a grape shrivels into a raisin.
When will the BepiColombo spacecraft reach Mercury?
The European and Japanese BepiColombo spacecraft is expected to enter orbit around Mercury in November. It will conduct a fuller survey of the planet.

Read it at the source

125 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

34
Show 26 more

Centre

38
Show 30 more

Right

18
Show 10 more

Not rated

35
Show 27 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Mercury Shrinkage Study | MediaBias News