Skip to the story
All stories

RWE relinquishes US offshore wind leases in $1.22bn Trump administration deal

The settlement is the fifth since March, bringing total federal buybacks to $3.9bn as states prepare lawsuits

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Turbines are visible at Sunrise Wind offshore wind farm that is under construction off the coast of Montauk Point, New York, April 23, 2026. (AP Photo/Joshua A. Bickel, File)

What this story says

  • RWE U.S. Offshore will relinquish offshore wind leases off New York, California and Louisiana for $1.22bn, bringing total federal buybacks to $3.9bn since March.
  • The Trump administration’s strategy follows court rulings blocking executive actions to halt offshore wind development.
  • RWE announced $900m investment in a Louisiana LNG project and $300m in natural gas turbines, part of 15 gas projects nationwide.
  • California and other states intend to sue over the lease cancellations, while Senator Sheldon Whitehouse called the buybacks a "money pump" for consumers.

Who covered it

Left 35%(31)Centre 50%(44)Right 15%(13)

Percentages are shares of the 88 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 28 of the 116 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

76/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

15/100

116 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 13 of the 88 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

RWE U.S. Offshore agreed to relinquish offshore wind leases off New York, California and Louisiana in a $1.22bn settlement with the Trump administration, as reported by the Associated Press and Washington Top News. The deal ends projects that could have generated seven gigawatts of power, enough for over five million homes. RWE said the leases represented years of planning and investment but cited no viable path to permitting under current federal policy.

The settlement is the fifth since March, bringing the total federal expenditure on offshore wind lease buybacks to approximately $3.9bn. Previous agreements involved TotalEnergies, Golden State Wind, Bluepoint Wind and Invenergy, each receiving reimbursements contingent on reinvestment in fossil fuel projects. The Trump administration adopted the buyback strategy after federal courts blocked its attempts to halt offshore wind development through executive orders, as reported by the Associated Press.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the agreement would strengthen energy security and keep electricity affordable, while Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat from Rhode Island, called the buybacks a "money pump" that would increase consumer costs. RWE announced it would invest $900m in a Louisiana LNG project and $300m in natural gas turbines, part of 15 gas projects across the United States, as reported by both the Associated Press and Washington Top News.

What the coverage left out

No right-rated outlet ran this story. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned RWE’s $300m investment in natural gas turbines or its 15 gas projects nationwide. The left-rated reports did not include the number of homes the cancelled projects could have powered, a figure carried by the Associated Press.

Coverage settled. We checked this 9 times and stopped on 12 Aug 2026, 00:45. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

31 rated outlets

  • Twenty-two left-rated outlets carried the story. The digests agree that RWE reached a $1.22 billion settlement with the Trump administration to abandon offshore wind leases off New York, California and Louisiana. They report the total spent on similar settlements now stands at nearly $4 billion.
  • The Associated Press report leads on the administration’s stated goal of discouraging wind energy in favour of fossil fuels. It quotes Interior Secretary Doug Burgum calling the deal a move toward energy security and affordability, and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse describing the buybacks as a scheme to benefit fossil fuel donors at consumer expense. The report details RWE’s planned $900 million investment in a Louisiana liquefied natural gas project.
  • Digests from Spiegel, Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Zeit Online and Liberation describe Trump as a wind power opponent and frame the deal as part of his administration’s campaign against renewable energy. None of the digests mention the states’ intention to sue, the court rulings that thwarted earlier executive action, or the requirement that companies invest settlement funds in fossil fuels.

Centre

44 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated digests uniformly reported the $1.22bn settlement and the three states involved. Thirteen of the thirteen centre-rated digests carried the total expenditure figure of $3.9bn, as seen in the Lake Charles American Press, The Record and KOB 4. Fortune and Maritime Reporter led on RWE’s reinvestment in Louisiana LNG and natural gas projects, with Fortune noting the administration’s $3bn spending on cancellations since March.
  • Washington Top News and the Associated Press, both reprinted in full, quoted Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s statement that the deal would provide "dependable baseload power" and keep electricity affordable. The Times-Standard included a local reaction from Humboldt County, quoting an unnamed source calling the deal a win for the fossil fuel industry and a loss for the planet. None of the centre-rated digests quoted Senator Whitehouse or used the term "money pump."

Right

13 rated outlets

  • Right-rated outlets led on the Trump administration’s payment of $1.22 billion to RWE to cancel offshore wind leases. All 12 digests reported the sum and the company’s withdrawal from projects off New York, California, and Louisiana. None mentioned the Biden administration’s earlier approval of the leases.
  • Nine digests framed the deal as a victory for Trump’s energy policy, using phrases like “Trump administration lands $1.22 billion deal” or “another major win.” Six linked RWE’s exit to a shift toward fossil fuels, citing natural gas or liquefied natural gas infrastructure as the company’s next focus. None included a statement from RWE explaining its decision.
  • Four digests stated the total settlements under Trump this year reached $4 billion, while two described the payment as taxpayer-funded. Reason’s digest called the policy “trading one bad energy policy in for another,” the only explicit criticism of the deal among these reports.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover RWE relinquishes US offshore wind leases in $1.22bn Trump…?
Of the 88 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 35% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 15% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 116. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is RWE relinquishes US offshore wind leases in $1.22bn Trump… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 88 rated outlets on this story, 35% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 15% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of RWE relinquishes US offshore wind leases in $1.22bn Trump… biased?
RWE relinquishes US offshore wind leases in $1.22bn Trump administration deal is one event reported by 116 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting RWE relinquishes US offshore wind leases in $1.22bn Trump…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered RWE relinquishes US offshore wind leases in $1.22bn Trump…?
116 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
How much did the Trump administration pay RWE to cancel its offshore wind leases?
The Trump administration agreed to pay RWE U.S. Offshore $1.22bn to relinquish offshore wind leases off New York, California and Louisiana. The settlement is the fifth since March, bringing total federal buybacks to $3.9bn, as reported by the Associated Press and Washington Top News.
Why did RWE agree to cancel its offshore wind projects?
RWE U.S. Offshore said its leases represented years of planning and investment but cited no viable path to permitting under current federal policy. The company will invest $1.2bn in Louisiana LNG and natural gas projects, as part of the settlement terms, according to the Associated Press.
Which states are affected by the offshore wind lease cancellations?
The cancelled leases were off the coasts of New York, California and Louisiana. California intends to sue over the cancellations, while other states may follow, as reported by the Associated Press and Washington Top News.
What did Senator Sheldon Whitehouse say about the offshore wind buybacks?
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse called the buybacks a "money pump" that would increase costs for consumers and a "corruption story" benefiting fossil fuel donors. He said the policy was a "scam," as quoted by the Associated Press and Washington Top News.

Read it at the source

116 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

31
Show 23 more

Centre

44
Show 36 more

Right

13
Show 5 more

Not rated

28
Show 20 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

RWE abandons US offshore wind projects in $1.22bn deal | MediaBias News