Is Clean Technica biased?
The bias data this site ingests places Clean Technica as leaning left. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Clean Technica biased?
The bias data this site ingests places Clean Technica as leaning left. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Clean Technica left or right?
The bias data this site ingests places Clean Technica as leaning left. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is Clean Technica reliable?
The factuality data this site ingests describes Clean Technica as high factuality. It reaches us without a named assessor, so it is an unattributed rating rather than our verdict. It does not guarantee that every report is correct.
What Clean Technica has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Clean Technica’s own report linked underneath.
RWE U.S. Offshore agreed to abandon offshore wind projects off New York, California and Louisiana for $1.22bn, the latest in a series of federal buybacks totalling $3.9bn. The company will invest $1.2bn in Louisiana LNG and natural gas projects, while states plan legal challenges.
Clean Technica reported it asDonald Trump Pays Off 5th Energy Company in Attack on Renewable Energy - CleanTechnica (opens Clean Technica in a new tab)
A Government Accountability Office audit found the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, claimed $110bn in savings that were either inaccurate or unsupported. The report also revealed 128 of 206 DOGE employees had left by January 2026, and agencies withheld ethics records.
Clean Technica reported it asMusk's Mayhem Continues Beyond DOGE Into Our Everyday Lives - CleanTechnica (opens Clean Technica in a new tab)
Who says so
The lean above is carried in the coverage data this site ingests, which names no rater for it. We publish it because it is what the rest of the site groups Clean Technica on, and we will not present it as an assessment by anyone in particular until we hold one.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
The rating above reaches us without a named assessor, and is published as that rather than as anyone’s verdict.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Clean Technica.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- California, United States
- Seen publishing on
- cleantechnica.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 7 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
We have not seen Clean Technica cover a story that outlets rated left were largely absent from.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Clean Technica: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 7 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 7 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Clean Technica, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.