Environmental protest at John Swinney’s residence over new gas plant

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Environmental protest at John Swinney’s residence over new gas plant?

Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 67% are rated left, 33% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 8. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is Environmental protest at John Swinney’s residence over new gas plant left or right?

Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.

Is the coverage of Environmental protest at John Swinney’s residence over new gas plant biased?

Environmental protest at John Swinney’s residence over new gas plant is one event reported by 8 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting Environmental protest at John Swinney’s residence over new gas plant?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered Environmental protest at John Swinney’s residence over new gas plant?

8 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What was the purpose of the protest outside Bute House?

Campaigners gathered to oppose the Scottish Government’s decision to approve a new gas‑fired power station at Peterhead, arguing that expanding fossil‑fuel infrastructure threatens climate goals and raises energy costs.

Who led the protest and what did they say?

Kate Whitaker, head of movement building for Friends of the Earth Scotland, said the approval was a “catastrophic failure” and warned that John Swinney would receive “no treats” this year because of the decision.

How did the Scottish Government respond to the protest?

A government spokesperson reiterated the administration’s commitment to achieve net‑zero emissions by 2045, cited a detailed decision letter, and declined to comment further on the specific protest.

Did any outlets report a different view of the protest?

All eight outlets reported the same core facts: a Halloween‑themed demonstration at Bute House, opposition to the Peterhead gas plant, Kate Whitaker’s “catastrophic failure” comment, and the government’s net‑zero pledge.