Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability, says Justice Secretary
Neil Gray stated the request for support during the Cairngorms wildfire was to explore all options.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

A firefighting helicopter drops water over a smoke-filled forest during a wildfire <i>(Image: Michael Varaklas)</i>
Photograph: The Herald Scotland (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Scottish ministers knew the UK military did not have aerial firefighting capacity when they requested help for the Cairngorms wildfire, according to Justice Secretary Neil Gray.
- Gray stated the request was made to explore 'every option' despite this informal knowledge.
- Scotland's fire service will now have helicopter resources on standby during high wildfire risk periods.
- Helicopter firefighting assets were not available at the start of the wildfire and arrived about 36 hours later, Gray said.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
65/100
Craft
75/100
Hype
15/100
6 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Scottish ministers were aware that the UK military did not possess aerial firefighting capabilities when they requested assistance during the Cairngorms wildfire. Justice Secretary Neil Gray stated that the Scottish Government knew 'informally' that the military 'did not have such assets in the UK'. However, he explained the request was made to explore 'every option'.
Gray announced that Scotland’s fire service will now have helicopter resources on standby during periods of high wildfire risk, with the ability to mobilise them directly to support firefighting operations. He added that work is commencing to improve aerial support availability, including options for four-nations collaboration and military support. Gray confirmed that helicopter firefighting assets were not available at the start of the wildfire and arrived approximately 36 hours after the incident began. He noted that additional aerial water bombing would have been helpful at times during the wildfire to supplement resources provided by commercial operators.
Disagreement on UK government's response
The Evening Standard reported that a UK Government spokesperson stated that when the request for assistance was received, the Secretary of State for Scotland and the Defence Secretary worked quickly to identify options, including deploying Chinook helicopters. The spokesperson added that the Scottish Government was informed of the available assistance and decided not to accept it. None of the other reports mention this UK Government statement.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated or centre-rated reports mention the £3 million the Scottish Government is providing for businesses impacted by the fire, a detail reported by The Herald Scotland and the Evening Standard. The left-rated reports do not include the UK Government spokesperson's statement that Scotland was made aware of available assistance and decided not to accept it, which was present in the Evening Standard's full report.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 3 Sept 2026, 18:45, and will add the sides that appear.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability, says Justice Secretary
Evening Standard — embedded from source
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
5 rated outlets
- The left-rated reports led on the Justice Secretary's admission that Scottish ministers knew the UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability when requesting assistance for the Cairngorms wildfire. The Herald Scotland, The Independent, and perspectivemedia.com all featured headlines stating this. These reports highlighted Neil Gray's explanation that the request was made to explore 'every option' despite this knowledge. They also reported Gray's announcement that Scotland's fire service will now have helicopter resources on standby during high wildfire risk periods and that assets arrived about 36 hours after the incident began. The Herald Scotland also included details from Scottish Land & Estates welcoming the new standby plan and mentioning the wildfire exposed a 'dangerous weakness' in Scotland's response.
Centre
1 rated outlet
- The centre-rated reports, from the Evening Standard and The National, focused on the Justice Secretary's defence of the request for military support despite knowing 'informally' that the UK military did not have the required equipment. Both outlets included headlines stating SNP ministers 'knew UK military did not have support asked for during wildfire'. The Evening Standard's full report included a UK Government spokesperson's statement that Scotland was informed of available assistance and chose not to accept it, a detail not present in the left-rated reports. Both centre-rated outlets also reported Gray's statement that helicopter assets arrived about 36 hours after the incident began.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability…?
- Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 83% are rated left, 17% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability… left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability… biased?
- Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability, says Justice Secretary is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked aerial firefighting ability…?
- 6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- Did Scottish ministers know the UK military had no aerial firefighting ability?
- Yes, according to Justice Secretary Neil Gray. He stated that Scottish ministers knew 'informally' the UK military did not have aerial firefighting assets when they requested assistance for the Cairngorms wildfire. Gray said the request was made to explore 'every option'.
- When did helicopter firefighting assets arrive for the Cairngorms wildfire?
- Neil Gray stated that helicopter firefighting assets were not available at the beginning of the wildfire. They arrived on site within approximately 36 hours after the incident started. He noted that additional aerial water bombing would have been helpful during the fire.
- What is Scotland's fire service doing to improve aerial support?
- Scotland's fire service will now have helicopter resources on standby during high wildfire risk periods, with the ability to mobilise them immediately. Justice Secretary Neil Gray also announced that work is commencing to improve aerial support availability, including options for four-nations collaboration and military support.
Read it at the source
6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
5- SNP ministers ‘knew UK military did not have support asked for during wildfire’ (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- SNP ministers ‘knew UK military did not have support asked for during wildfire’ (opens The National in a new tab)
The National — is The National biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Scottish ministers knew UK military lacked wildfire helicopters, Gray admits (opens The Herald Scotland in a new tab)
The Herald Scotland — is The Herald Scotland biased? Our profile of this outlet
- SNP ministers ‘knew UK military did not have support asked for during wildfire’ (opens perspectivemedia.com in a new tab)
perspectivemedia.com — is perspectivemedia.com biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- SNP ministers ‘knew UK military did not have support asked for during wildfire’ (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
1Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
More in Climate
All Climate →Elsewhere on the site
Politics•3 min readBurnham and Macron meet at Downing Street to discuss defence and migration
Politics•4 min readAnas Sarwar leaves Holyrood to join House of Lords as UK trade minister
Conflict & Security•5 min readUK and France deploy 45 officers to stop mega-dinghies carrying 230 migrants
Media•3 min readMacron visits London for Bayeux Tapestry viewing and talks with Burnham