Skip to the story
All stories

Iran warns US of retaliation amid claims of impending attack

Tehran states it has intelligence that the US is preparing new assaults and threatens consequences for any nation supporting such actions.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Ιράν: Ενημερωθήκαμε ότι οι ΗΠΑ ετοιμάζουν επιθέσεις εναντίον μας – Θα απαντήσουμε χωρίς περιορισμούς

What this story says

  • Iran's central military command claims to have intelligence about impending US attacks.
  • Tehran has warned that any US attack would trigger retaliation against American bases and interests in the Middle East.
  • Any country supporting a US attack would be considered a participant in the conflict, according to Iran.
  • The Iranian military stated the US decision to attack was made during a joint meeting in a European country.

Who covered it

Left 26%(52)Centre 32%(63)Right 42%(84)

Percentages are shares of the 199 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 264 of the 463 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

41/100

463 sources · methodology

Iran's central military command has stated it has information suggesting the United States is preparing new attacks. The command issued a warning that any US assault would lead to retaliation against American bases and interests in the Middle East. Iran also stated that any country supporting a US attack would be considered a participant in the conflict.

According to the Iranian military command, the US decision to attack was made during a joint meeting held in a European country. Some regional countries are reported to have given their approval for US actions against Iran.

Disagreement on meeting location

The Iranian military command claimed the US decision to attack was made during a joint meeting in a European country, as reported by in.gr. Welt stated that the military referred to unconfirmed reports about a meeting of US representatives in a European country.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated reports mention the claim that the US decision to attack was made during a joint meeting in a European country. None of the centre-rated reports mention the claim that the US decision to attack was made during a joint meeting in a European country. None of the right-rated reports mention the claim that the US decision to attack was made during a joint meeting in a European country.

Coverage settled. We checked this 12 times and stopped on 26 Sept 2026, 12:15. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

52 rated outlets

  • The left-leaning outlets reported that Iran warned the US and its allies against a new attack. They stated Iran had received information that such a move was being prepared. Several reports mentioned Iran's conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
  • The reports noted Iran's claim that it would respond without restriction or hesitation to any US action. Some outlets included Iran's assertion that any regional country supporting an attack would be considered a participant in the conflict.
  • The digests did not include details on the specific US actions Iran claimed were planned. None of the reports mentioned any specific regional countries Iran alleged were supporting the US.

Centre

63 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated outlets led on Iran's warning against new attacks by the United States and its allies. Many reports stated Iran claimed to have information that such a move was being prepared.
  • Several outlets mentioned Iran's military warning of sustained strikes against US bases and interests across the Middle East if attacked. Some reports noted this added to regional anxiety after previous strikes.
  • Two outlets reported Iran's conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. These included ending the war, releasing funds, and lifting the American blockade.

Right

84 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports highlighted Iran's warning of sustained retaliation if the US launches a new attack. These reports carried Iran's claim of having information that the US was preparing new actions. The right-rated reports also stated that Iran warned any new attack would trigger sustained retaliation against US bases and interests. Some right-rated reports mentioned that a number of countries in the region are said to have given permission for these actions.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Iran warns US of retaliation amid claims of impending attack?
Of the 199 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 26% are rated left, 32% are rated centre, 42% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 463. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Iran warns US of retaliation amid claims of impending attack left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 199 rated outlets on this story, 26% are rated left, 32% are rated centre, 42% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Iran warns US of retaliation amid claims of impending attack biased?
Iran warns US of retaliation amid claims of impending attack is one event reported by 463 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Iran warns US of retaliation amid claims of impending attack?
463 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What has Iran claimed about US intentions?
Iran's central military command has stated it possesses information indicating the United States is preparing new attacks. The command also claimed the US decision to attack was made during a joint meeting in a European country.
What is Iran's warning to the US?
Iran has warned that any US attack would lead to retaliation against American bases and interests in the Middle East. The country also stated that any nation supporting a US attack would be considered a participant in the conflict.
Which countries have allegedly given the US a 'green light'?
The Iranian military command claimed that some regional countries have given the 'green light' for US actions against Iran. This information was reported by in.gr.

Read it at the source

468 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

53
Show 45 more

Centre

63
Show 55 more

Right

84
Show 76 more

Not rated

268
Show 260 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Iran US Conflict | MediaBias News