Is Greater Kashmir biased?
Ad Fontes Media places Greater Kashmir in the centre. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Greater Kashmir biased?
Ad Fontes Media places Greater Kashmir in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Greater Kashmir left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places Greater Kashmir in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Greater Kashmir reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Greater Kashmir are Ad Fontes Media: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Greater Kashmir has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Greater Kashmir’s own report linked underneath.
The Reserve Bank of India’s Monetary Policy Committee voted unanimously on 5 August 2026 to hold the repo rate at 5.25%, citing resilient domestic demand and persistent global uncertainties. The central bank also reduced its Consumer Price Index inflation projection for 2026-27 to 5.0%.
Greater Kashmir reported it asRBI keeps policy rate unchanged for third time in row in FY27 amid West Asia crisis (opens Greater Kashmir in a new tab)
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed progress in negotiations with Iran and Oman to increase commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, though no final agreement has been reached. Qatar and Pakistan are mediating, with a Saudi source suggesting a deal could be announced within days.
Greater Kashmir reported it asNew talks 'last chance' for Iran to forge deal, avoid escalation of US strikes: Trump (opens Greater Kashmir in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MediacenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Ad Fontes MediahighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Greater Kashmir.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- greaterkashmir.com
- Seen publishing on
- greaterkashmir.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Greater Kashmir is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Greater Kashmir: its report arrived a median of 23 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 August 2026. Ratings pulled 8 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Greater Kashmir, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Greater Kashmir publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.