Skip to the story
All stories

NATO official: Russia increasing hybrid acts, no imminent attack threat

Alliance sees no immediate danger despite stepped-up Russian activity in Europe, Polish PM warns of potential provocations.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
NATO sees no imminent threat of attack, official says

What this story says

  • Russia is increasing its hybrid actions in Europe, according to a NATO official.
  • The alliance currently sees no imminent threat of attack on any member state.
  • Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk warned that Russian provocations against NATO members are possible.
  • CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Russian intelligence counterparts to discuss potential Russian operations against a NATO member.

Who covered it

Left 20%(6)Centre 43%(13)Right 37%(11)

Percentages are shares of the 30 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 25 of the 55 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

85/100

Hype

12/100

55 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 6 of the 30 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

A NATO official stated on Sunday that Russia is intensifying its hybrid activities across Europe. Despite these actions, the official indicated that the alliance does not currently perceive an imminent threat of attack. The official added that NATO remains vigilant and committed to the safety of its population.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Saturday that Poland and NATO must prepare for various scenarios, and that a Russian provocation against any NATO member cannot be ruled out. Separately, CIA Director John Ratcliffe travelled to Russia on Tuesday to meet with intelligence officials. Two sources told Reuters that Ratcliffe raised the possibility of a Russian operation targeting a NATO member during this meeting.

Disagreement on drone attack responsibility

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz stated on Tuesday that the German government would soon identify who was responsible for an attempted drone attack on Leipzig/Halle airport earlier this month. Russia has denied involvement in sabotage or attacks in Europe, dismissing such accusations as Western propaganda.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated reports covered this story. The right-rated digests did not mention the attempted drone attack on Leipzig/Halle airport or the German government's statement that responsibility would soon be announced.

Coverage settled. We checked this 36 times and stopped on 5 Sept 2026, 09:45. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

6 rated outlets

  • All six left‑rated outlets reported that a NATO official said Russia is stepping up hybrid activity in Europe while the alliance does not see an imminent Russian attack. The reports said NATO remains alert to a range of threats and noted continued Russian aggression against Ukraine.
  • Dnevni list Danas published a full article that quoted an unnamed NATO official, included the official’s statement that Russia intensifies attacks on Ukraine and hybrid actions in Europe, and added Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s warning that NATO must be ready for any provocation. The digests from IndexHR, censor.net and Kyiv Post did not mention Tusk, and none of the digests reproduced the official’s direct quotation.

Centre

13 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports led with the NATO official's statement that Russia is stepping up hybrid acts in Europe but that the alliance sees no imminent threat of attack. These reports included details about Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk's warning of potential Russian provocations and CIA Director John Ratcliffe's meeting with Russian intelligence counterparts. The attempted drone attack on Leipzig/Halle airport and the German government's promise to announce responsibility were also covered. Devdiscourse, in its full report, quoted the NATO official saying, "At this time, we see no imminent threat of attack," and also noted that "NATO continues to work around the clock to keep our one billion people safe."

Right

11 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports focused on the NATO official's assertion that the alliance sees no imminent threat of attack from Russia, despite an increase in hybrid actions. These digests mentioned Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk's statement that a Russian provocation cannot be ruled out. The CIA Director's meeting with Russian intelligence was also noted in some reports. The attempted drone attack on Leipzig/Halle airport was not mentioned in the right-rated digests provided.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover NATO official: Russia increasing hybrid acts, no imminent attack threat?
Of the 30 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 20% are rated left, 43% are rated centre, 37% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 55. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is NATO official: Russia increasing hybrid acts, no imminent attack threat left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 30 rated outlets on this story, 20% are rated left, 43% are rated centre, 37% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of NATO official: Russia increasing hybrid acts, no imminent attack threat biased?
NATO official: Russia increasing hybrid acts, no imminent attack threat is one event reported by 55 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting NATO official: Russia increasing hybrid acts, no imminent attack threat?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered NATO official: Russia increasing hybrid acts, no imminent attack threat?
55 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Is NATO facing an imminent threat of attack from Russia?
A NATO official stated that while Russia is increasing its hybrid actions in Europe, the alliance currently sees no imminent threat of attack. This assessment was made despite ongoing Russian activities and warnings from Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk about potential provocations.
What was discussed in the meeting between the CIA director and Russian intelligence?
CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Russian intelligence counterparts. Two sources told Reuters that Ratcliffe discussed a possible Russian operation against a NATO member during this meeting, though the full scope of the discussion is unclear.
What is the German government's stance on the Leipzig/Halle airport drone attack?
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz indicated that the German government will soon announce who is responsible for an attempted drone attack on Leipzig/Halle airport. Russia has consistently denied any involvement in such incidents.

Read it at the source

55 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

6

Centre

13
Show 5 more

Right

11
Show 3 more

Not rated

25
Show 17 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Russia's hybrid actions in Europe | MediaBias News