Skip to the story
All stories

Russian troops used civilians as human shields near Kupiansk

Drone footage shows nine civilians, including children and the elderly, forced into a gas pipeline during a Russian retreat.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Andrii Sîbiga. Foto: Profimedia

What this story says

  • Russian troops kidnapped nine Ukrainian civilians, including children and the elderly, to use as human shields during their retreat near Kupiansk.
  • The civilians were forced to travel through a gas pipeline approximately 10 kilometers long.
  • Ukrainian forces detected the group but did not fire to avoid harming the civilians.
  • Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha stated that these actions constitute war crimes and violations of international humanitarian law.

Who covered it

Left 67%(4)Centre 16%(1)Right 17%(1)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 13 of the 19 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

50/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

45/100

19 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 1 of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Russian troops kidnapped nine Ukrainian civilians, including children and the elderly, to use as human shields during their retreat near Kupiansk. The civilians were forced to travel through a gas pipeline approximately 10 kilometers long. Ukrainian forces detected the group but did not fire to avoid harming the civilians. The Ukrainian Khartiia Corps released drone footage documenting the incident. Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha stated that these actions constitute war crimes and violations of international humanitarian law.

Disagreement on details of the incident

Digi 24 reported that the Russian soldiers were disguised in civilian clothes and that one of them appeared to be filming the civilians with a mobile phone. The outlet also suggested that the Russians might present the action as a humanitarian evacuation. Kyiv Post stated that the identities of the men accompanying the civilians could not be confirmed from the footage alone, though the corps suspected they were Russian soldiers who had removed their uniforms. The same outlet noted that Russian forces had previously used the pipeline to move troops toward the city.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mention the specific date of September 27 for the incident. The right-rated digest does not mention Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha's statement that the actions constitute war crimes and violations of international humanitarian law.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 28 Sept 2026, 18:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

WATCH: Ukraine Says Russian Troops Led Children Into Gas Pipeline to Cover Retreat
Kyiv PostLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

4 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports led on the use of civilians, including children and the elderly, as human shields by Russian troops during their retreat. They highlighted that Ukrainian forces detected the group but refrained from firing to protect the civilians. The reports also noted the release of drone footage by the Khartiia Corps and stated that Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha described the actions as war crimes and violations of international humanitarian law. United24 specifically mentioned the gas pipeline was six miles long.

Centre

1 rated outlet

  • Digi 24, rated centre, led with the declaration by Kyiv that a Russian sabotage group used Ukrainian civilians as a human shield during their retreat. The report detailed that nine civilians, including children and the elderly, were kidnapped on September 27 near Kupiansk and forced into a gas pipeline. It also mentioned the release of drone footage by the Khartiia Corps and quoted Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha calling the actions war crimes.

Right

1 rated outlet

  • Korrespondent.net, rated right, reported that occupying forces covered for civilians while retreating from Kharkiv region. The report noted that drones recorded nine civilians, including children and the elderly, as well as men of recruitment age in civilian clothes, who may be Russian military personnel, according to the National Guard of Ukraine.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Russian troops used civilians as human shields near Kupiansk?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 67% are rated left, 16% are rated centre, 17% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 19. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Russian troops used civilians as human shields near Kupiansk left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Russian troops used civilians as human shields near Kupiansk biased?
Russian troops used civilians as human shields near Kupiansk is one event reported by 19 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Russian troops used civilians as human shields near Kupiansk?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Russian troops used civilians as human shields near Kupiansk?
19 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What happened near Kupiansk?
Russian troops kidnapped nine Ukrainian civilians, including children and the elderly, and forced them into a gas pipeline approximately 10 kilometers long during their retreat. This action was documented by drone footage released by Ukraine's Khartiia Corps.
Why did Ukrainian forces not fire on the group?
Ukrainian forces detected the group but did not open fire to avoid harming the civilians who were being used as human shields by the Russian troops during their retreat.
What is the Ukrainian government's response to the incident?
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha stated that these actions constitute war crimes and violations of international humanitarian law. He emphasised that such acts must be documented and investigated for those responsible to be held accountable.

Read it at the source

19 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

4

Centre

1

Right

1

Not rated

13
Show 5 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Russian troops use civilians as shields | MediaBias News